- Jan 8, 2006
- 5,368
- 6,404
IMO the fact there has been no quick public apology speaks volumes.
Perhaps he thinks it dosen't warrant an apology.
IMO the fact there has been no quick public apology speaks volumes.
new student....Since "lessons" clearly haven't been learned, perhaps we need a new teacher.
I think we can agree that he has something to prove at Spurs after being injured. However, the isolated action of accepting a contract improvement shouldn't be held against him. What should he have done? Rejected a new contract entirely because he was worth a million more?True.
Only difference is we wouldn't have then gone sick for a whole year and thought 'fuck this, I'm worth so much more now I'm nearly healthy again, lets slag these ****s off so they have to sack me so I can get what I am truly worth.'
but you can argue that yanited has a much greater turnover than us...
Ehh.... let's not be daft. Yes Davies is not as good as Rose - nobody is saying otherwise but to dismiss his impact since Rose got injured is ridiculous.
I'd much prefer Shaw - 6 years younger than Bertrand and still only 22!Ryan Bertrand would seriously soften the blow.
Considering his history with Pochettino, if we could keep him injury free (massive if) he would be a monster for us.I'd much prefer Shaw - 6 years younger than Bertrand and still only 22!
Considering his history with Pochettino, if we could keep him injury free (massive if) he would be a monster for us.
Didn't realise Bertrand was older than Rose, or that Shaw was that young, would definitely prefer Shaw then if we'd a choice but again the fucking wages would be an issue there you would think. Money has killed football.I'd much prefer Shaw - 6 years younger than Bertrand and still only 22!
Asked for more then maybe?I think we can agree that he has something to prove at Spurs after being injured. However, the isolated action of accepting a contract improvement shouldn't be held against him. What should he have done? Rejected a new contract entirely because he was worth a million more?
What stone?I'd much prefer Shaw - 6 years younger than Bertrand and still only 22!
You are right, but now we are simply going in circles. He behaved useless in the media. Yet, he should be allowed to accept a contract renewal in the past.Asked for more then maybe?
Reject a deal until he thought it reflected his worth?
What he definitely shouldn't have done though is live off his unearned wages then demand more giving less...
All the while pissing on what the club has built under Poch et al.
Dude, you're entitled to your onions but regarding the bit in bold have you not noticed the building site where WHL used to be?
Didn't realise Bertrand was older than Rose, or that Shaw was that young, would definitely prefer Shaw then if we'd a choice but again the fucking wages would be an issue there you would think. Money has killed football.
This and this! AmenAbsolutely spot on!