- Apr 21, 2005
- 9,429
- 12,383
**I've been wanting to write this article about our midfield for sometime now. With the current emotive situation at Spurs over the last couple of days, I figured now would be as good a time as any. So let the discussion about our midfield begin :grin: !**
With a decent enough defence, and okay strike-force, I believe that our main problem this year has been the lack of talent and/or balance in the midfield.
By this I mean that some of the players do not possess what it takes to be in a top 5 squad (afterall, that's what we were aiming for before this relegation scrap came along), while other players have the talent, but don't fit into any particular system which Spurs have deployed this year.
I'm sure that some readers will disagree with some of my player assessments, stating that in certain games said player was fantastic. I don't doubt that this was probably the case. However, every football team needs players who apply themselves week in and week out, stringing together a run of form, thus helping the team put together back to back results.
Anyhow, below is a break-down of our midfield options:
Zokora: Probably our most physically impressive midfielder, displaying the hall-marks of a Premier League player; strength, pace, aggression, lunacy :grin:. However, anyone who's ever seen Zokora play can spot his weaknesses almost instantly; impetuous, rash, a wayward passer and the ability to dribble the ball 60 yards around every opposition player, including the keeper, before blasting the ball into Alan Green's commentary box. Not exactly the type of player to build a top 5 midfield around.
However, we could resign Atouba to form the funniest, and craziest, double-act since Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas! Or we could just put him on the transfer list.
Bentley: I have to confess I was rather excited when we signed him. He has great skill and passing ability, as well as a certain amount of natural flair. However, his attitude aside, just like Tom Huddlestone (below) his lack of pace is a real concern. In the current Premier League you've got to have pace, especially if you're going to be playing out wide where there is more space to utilise, but sadly Bentley lacks it. Added to this, if you wanted to utilise Modric's abilities in a 4-5-1 (below), then Bentley wouldn't be quick enough to support the striker, attack down the wing, or get back into a defensive position when needed.
For me, an effective Premier League side has to be built around pace and physique, which Bentley lacks.
Huddlestone: Great vision, great passer; terrible pace and mobility. For this reason alone, I'm afraid to say, he shouldn't have a future at Spurs. The Hudd would have been a great player 15 years ago, when midfielders got a hell of a lot more time on the ball, and didn't have to run around the pitch like lunatics on heat.
In today's game, though, pace and physique are par-for-the-course. To be fair to Huddlestone, he's done a lot of work on his fitness, but he'll never have the pace needed to be an effective Premier League player. If one looks at the top 4-5 clubs in the league (at least; I believe you could detail clubs lower down the league as well), all of them possess midfield players who are quick, mobile and energetic. Arsenal, Man Utd, Chelsea and Liverpool aside, this has been one of Aston Villa's main threats this year!
Lennon: Great pace and skill, and very young as well. Due to his light-weight stature, he needs stronger more physical players around him to help him out. The current Tottenham players who possess those physical attributes (Zokora), sadly do not possess the technical attributes needed to succeed in the Premier League.
Jenas: I can understand why people like the guy; and I can understand why people hate him. He's the closest thing we have to the personification of Spurs; talented and skillful, with bags of potential and an expensive price tag to boot, but who never quite lives up to the fans' and pundits' expectations. For this reason alone, he should be captain of Tottenham Hotspur FC :grin:.
While the debate rages whether Spurs should keep him or not, the fact remains that Jenas simply cannot consistently dominate the central midfield during games, in the same way that top draw central midfielders can; he doesn't even seem to do this against so called 'lesser' teams!
Modric: A great player....when played in a 4-5-1, or similar formation. There maybe a chance that he could play in a 4-4-2, but a truly outstanding defensive midfielder would need to play behind him, and the wingers in such a side would also have to do their fair share of tackling. This is not to say that Modric doesn't get stuck in; he does, and he's pretty tough for a little lad. But when he clashes with other central midfielders in the Premier League, for example Essien, it's like Joe Pesci going up against Tyson. The angry Italian may want to rip Iron Mike's head off, but it just ain't going to happen.
For Modric to be truly effective, then a 4-5-1 would have to be selected. This would require two pacy and skillful widemen (possibly Lennon and Dos Santos), complimented by two hard working, and technically gifted, defensive midfielders; two players we don't possess.
Ghaly: A player who doesn't seem to have a set position, which reduces his effectiveness. Unsure what Harry will get out of him in the future, although he's probably not good enough for the Premier League, considering he didn't get a game for Derby last year.
Taarabt: Who knows? The management (i) don't rate him, or (ii) don't want to risk him in these troublesome times. I doubt he's the type of player for a relegation slug-fest, and from the few times we've seen him he seems to have plenty of skill, but no end-product. Shame.
KPB: Now on loan, I won't dwell on him too much. I haven't seen anything of the guy that would suggest he should be anywhere near the Premier League, let alone an aspiring club looking to push on.
O'Hara: I like O'Hara a lot; plenty of bite and confidence, and still pretty young. The problem seems to be that he is still considered a squad player, having not made any particular postion his own. This season we've mainly seen him on the left hand side of midfield, probably to compensate for not having a natural defensive midfielder in the side. He doesn't possess the natural flair and creativity to be an accomplished winger, so perhaps in the future a central midfield role might be suitable?
Dos Santos: Obviously has plenty of pace and skill, but is he physically and mentally ready for the rigours of Premier League football? I think if we had two hard-tackling bad-boys in the centre of the park, and an experienced left back, then we might have seen more of DS this year. Unfortunately we don't on both accounts, so DS's appearances have been few and far between.
So as one can see, our midfield is made up of odds-and-sods. A jumble of talent, crap and potential, some of which lacks the robust physical nature needed for the Premier League. It also lacks balance, and it lacks potency
There is hope though, in the fact that we don't need to overhaul the entire central midfield. If we happened to sign two good central midfielders -and it looks like we're already getting one in Appiah- I believe that our performances would improve incredibly, because we would have more options. We could play a straight 4-4-2, or a truly effective a 4-5-1 with Modric calling the shots in the centre, knowing that he's got two solid midfielders backing him up.
Essentially we've signed individuals for too long. We must change tact and begin to sign players who will collectively form a well balanced team.
With a decent enough defence, and okay strike-force, I believe that our main problem this year has been the lack of talent and/or balance in the midfield.
By this I mean that some of the players do not possess what it takes to be in a top 5 squad (afterall, that's what we were aiming for before this relegation scrap came along), while other players have the talent, but don't fit into any particular system which Spurs have deployed this year.
I'm sure that some readers will disagree with some of my player assessments, stating that in certain games said player was fantastic. I don't doubt that this was probably the case. However, every football team needs players who apply themselves week in and week out, stringing together a run of form, thus helping the team put together back to back results.
Anyhow, below is a break-down of our midfield options:
Zokora: Probably our most physically impressive midfielder, displaying the hall-marks of a Premier League player; strength, pace, aggression, lunacy :grin:. However, anyone who's ever seen Zokora play can spot his weaknesses almost instantly; impetuous, rash, a wayward passer and the ability to dribble the ball 60 yards around every opposition player, including the keeper, before blasting the ball into Alan Green's commentary box. Not exactly the type of player to build a top 5 midfield around.
However, we could resign Atouba to form the funniest, and craziest, double-act since Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas! Or we could just put him on the transfer list.
Bentley: I have to confess I was rather excited when we signed him. He has great skill and passing ability, as well as a certain amount of natural flair. However, his attitude aside, just like Tom Huddlestone (below) his lack of pace is a real concern. In the current Premier League you've got to have pace, especially if you're going to be playing out wide where there is more space to utilise, but sadly Bentley lacks it. Added to this, if you wanted to utilise Modric's abilities in a 4-5-1 (below), then Bentley wouldn't be quick enough to support the striker, attack down the wing, or get back into a defensive position when needed.
For me, an effective Premier League side has to be built around pace and physique, which Bentley lacks.
Huddlestone: Great vision, great passer; terrible pace and mobility. For this reason alone, I'm afraid to say, he shouldn't have a future at Spurs. The Hudd would have been a great player 15 years ago, when midfielders got a hell of a lot more time on the ball, and didn't have to run around the pitch like lunatics on heat.
In today's game, though, pace and physique are par-for-the-course. To be fair to Huddlestone, he's done a lot of work on his fitness, but he'll never have the pace needed to be an effective Premier League player. If one looks at the top 4-5 clubs in the league (at least; I believe you could detail clubs lower down the league as well), all of them possess midfield players who are quick, mobile and energetic. Arsenal, Man Utd, Chelsea and Liverpool aside, this has been one of Aston Villa's main threats this year!
Lennon: Great pace and skill, and very young as well. Due to his light-weight stature, he needs stronger more physical players around him to help him out. The current Tottenham players who possess those physical attributes (Zokora), sadly do not possess the technical attributes needed to succeed in the Premier League.
Jenas: I can understand why people like the guy; and I can understand why people hate him. He's the closest thing we have to the personification of Spurs; talented and skillful, with bags of potential and an expensive price tag to boot, but who never quite lives up to the fans' and pundits' expectations. For this reason alone, he should be captain of Tottenham Hotspur FC :grin:.
While the debate rages whether Spurs should keep him or not, the fact remains that Jenas simply cannot consistently dominate the central midfield during games, in the same way that top draw central midfielders can; he doesn't even seem to do this against so called 'lesser' teams!
Modric: A great player....when played in a 4-5-1, or similar formation. There maybe a chance that he could play in a 4-4-2, but a truly outstanding defensive midfielder would need to play behind him, and the wingers in such a side would also have to do their fair share of tackling. This is not to say that Modric doesn't get stuck in; he does, and he's pretty tough for a little lad. But when he clashes with other central midfielders in the Premier League, for example Essien, it's like Joe Pesci going up against Tyson. The angry Italian may want to rip Iron Mike's head off, but it just ain't going to happen.
For Modric to be truly effective, then a 4-5-1 would have to be selected. This would require two pacy and skillful widemen (possibly Lennon and Dos Santos), complimented by two hard working, and technically gifted, defensive midfielders; two players we don't possess.
Ghaly: A player who doesn't seem to have a set position, which reduces his effectiveness. Unsure what Harry will get out of him in the future, although he's probably not good enough for the Premier League, considering he didn't get a game for Derby last year.
Taarabt: Who knows? The management (i) don't rate him, or (ii) don't want to risk him in these troublesome times. I doubt he's the type of player for a relegation slug-fest, and from the few times we've seen him he seems to have plenty of skill, but no end-product. Shame.
KPB: Now on loan, I won't dwell on him too much. I haven't seen anything of the guy that would suggest he should be anywhere near the Premier League, let alone an aspiring club looking to push on.
O'Hara: I like O'Hara a lot; plenty of bite and confidence, and still pretty young. The problem seems to be that he is still considered a squad player, having not made any particular postion his own. This season we've mainly seen him on the left hand side of midfield, probably to compensate for not having a natural defensive midfielder in the side. He doesn't possess the natural flair and creativity to be an accomplished winger, so perhaps in the future a central midfield role might be suitable?
Dos Santos: Obviously has plenty of pace and skill, but is he physically and mentally ready for the rigours of Premier League football? I think if we had two hard-tackling bad-boys in the centre of the park, and an experienced left back, then we might have seen more of DS this year. Unfortunately we don't on both accounts, so DS's appearances have been few and far between.
So as one can see, our midfield is made up of odds-and-sods. A jumble of talent, crap and potential, some of which lacks the robust physical nature needed for the Premier League. It also lacks balance, and it lacks potency
There is hope though, in the fact that we don't need to overhaul the entire central midfield. If we happened to sign two good central midfielders -and it looks like we're already getting one in Appiah- I believe that our performances would improve incredibly, because we would have more options. We could play a straight 4-4-2, or a truly effective a 4-5-1 with Modric calling the shots in the centre, knowing that he's got two solid midfielders backing him up.
Essentially we've signed individuals for too long. We must change tact and begin to sign players who will collectively form a well balanced team.