Do you want Levy/ENIC out?

[Archibald&Crooks]

Ha ! Finally, after a 2 week ban (presumably for just giving my `onest opinion of Levy).

Read the PM you would have received telling you why you were banned. And then presume again.

 

[Mullers]

Ha ! Finally, after a 2 week ban (presumably for just giving my `onest opinion of Levy) I am able to vote and see the results. I cannot believe that nearly 60% want ENIC to stay. Even now. Astounding. What a bunch of unambitious, grass isn`t greener, happy to accept mediocrity, peasants we seem to be. I suppose at least the 40% who want them out is growing every week. Needless to say, I voted yes to the question.

To be fair if that was the reason for your banning then I would have been permanently banned a long time ago.

 

[mikspurz]

I don't want Levy out. He's kept a very tight ship and I reckon people should be careful what they wish for. We could end up with another Vincent Tan.

He so fucking tight he squeaks.

 

[Japhet]

He so fucking tight he squeaks.

We could always go for a Peter Risdale type who took Leeds to the brink of extinction if you think that's a better option.

 

[parklane1]

Ha ! Finally, after a 2 week ban (presumably for just giving my `onest opinion of Levy) I am able to vote and see the results. I cannot believe that nearly 60% want ENIC to stay. Even now. Astounding. What a bunch of unambitious, grass isn`t greener, happy to accept mediocrity, peasants we seem to be. I suppose at least the 40% who want them out is growing every week. Needless to say, I voted yes to the question.

All about opinions and I disagree with you.

 

[shelfboy68]

We could always go for a Peter Risdale type who took Leeds to the brink of extinction if you think that's a better option.

Why is it anytime someone mentions an alternative to Levy we get this response what about abramovich or mansoor i dont think they have done to bad have they.

 

[tiger666]

Why is it anytime someone mentions an alternative to Levy we get this response what about abramovich or mansoor i dont think they have done to bad have they.

Only because they're loaded and got in before FFP came in.

 

[Japhet]

Why is it anytime someone mentions an alternative to Levy we get this response what about abramovich or mansoor i dont think they have done to bad have they.

I'd rather not go down the 'plastic' route.

 

[parklane1]

I'd rather not go down the 'plastic' route.

Amen to that.

 

[shelfboy68]

Only because they're loaded and got in before FFP came in.

Yeah i know but the fact is they have come in and won stuff and are doing ok not everyone is a bad owner.

 

[shelfboy68]

I'd rather not go down the 'plastic' route.

Thats your right of course but i have No problem with stacking up the silverware which is something we wont see under enic.
However it doesnt matter as enic are not selling and No one wants to buy so its irelavant.

 

[Mullers]

Why is it anytime someone mentions an alternative to Levy we get this response what about abramovich or mansoor i dont think they have done to bad have they.

Yeah i know but the fact is they have come in and won stuff and are doing ok not everyone is a bad owner.

BSoDL Autoresponse:

1. Be careful who you wish for.
2. The grass isn't always greener.
3. Who do YOU want to be chairman then?
4. We're punching at our weight.
5. We've punched above our weight,

 

[shelfboy68]

BSoDL Autoresponse:

1. Be careful who you wish for.
2. The grass isn't always greener.
3. Who do YOU want to be chairman then?
4. We're punching at our weight.
5. We've punched above our weight,

Yeah that is the response that is always trotted out i just dont get it.

 

[Mullers]

Yeah that is the response that is always trotted out i just dont get it.

It´s because winning one trophy in 14 years is shit and there isn´t an affective argument against that.

 

[tiger666]

It´s because winning one trophy in 14 years is shit and there isn´t an affective argument against that.

There is and they've been posted relentlessly. You just refuse to accept them.

 

[Mullers]

There is and they've been posted relentlessly. You just refuse to accept them.

I refuse to accept them because I don't find them to be affective arguments. One trophy in 14 years is terrible even some of Levy's supporters accept that it's not good enough.

 

[shelfboy68]

I refuse to accept them because I don't find them to be affective arguments. One trophy in 14 years is terrible even some of Levy's supporters accept that it's not good enough.

The usual argument is that Levy couldnt envisisage Chelsea or city getting big but by that notion one day palace,Qpr or Norwich might pass us by will we still use that as an excuse.

 

[Mullers]

The usual argument is that Levy couldnt envisisage Chelsea or city getting big but by that notion one day palace,Qpr or Norwich might pass us by will we still use that as an excuse.

Yep and as I said in a previous post it was arguably just as tough if not tougher in Sugars day.

 

[parklane1]

There is and they've been posted relentlessly. You just refuse to accept them.

Nail on the head.

 

[mikspurz]

We could always go for a Peter Risdale type who took Leeds to the brink of extinction if you think that's a better option.

Would prefer the Abramovich type thank you very much. We can of course keep the status quo seeing as your a big fan of Levy and his distinguished trophy laden dynasty.