- Feb 1, 2005
- 55,711
- 205,999
- Admin
- #301
Read the PM you would have received telling you why you were banned. And then presume again.Ha ! Finally, after a 2 week ban (presumably for just giving my `onest opinion of Levy).
Read the PM you would have received telling you why you were banned. And then presume again.Ha ! Finally, after a 2 week ban (presumably for just giving my `onest opinion of Levy).
To be fair if that was the reason for your banning then I would have been permanently banned a long time ago.Ha ! Finally, after a 2 week ban (presumably for just giving my `onest opinion of Levy) I am able to vote and see the results. I cannot believe that nearly 60% want ENIC to stay. Even now. Astounding. What a bunch of unambitious, grass isn`t greener, happy to accept mediocrity, peasants we seem to be. I suppose at least the 40% who want them out is growing every week. Needless to say, I voted yes to the question.
He so fucking tight he squeaks.I don't want Levy out. He's kept a very tight ship and I reckon people should be careful what they wish for. We could end up with another Vincent Tan.
He so fucking tight he squeaks.
Ha ! Finally, after a 2 week ban (presumably for just giving my `onest opinion of Levy) I am able to vote and see the results. I cannot believe that nearly 60% want ENIC to stay. Even now. Astounding. What a bunch of unambitious, grass isn`t greener, happy to accept mediocrity, peasants we seem to be. I suppose at least the 40% who want them out is growing every week. Needless to say, I voted yes to the question.
We could always go for a Peter Risdale type who took Leeds to the brink of extinction if you think that's a better option.
Why is it anytime someone mentions an alternative to Levy we get this response what about abramovich or mansoor i dont think they have done to bad have they.
Why is it anytime someone mentions an alternative to Levy we get this response what about abramovich or mansoor i dont think they have done to bad have they.
I'd rather not go down the 'plastic' route.
Only because they're loaded and got in before FFP came in.
I'd rather not go down the 'plastic' route.
Why is it anytime someone mentions an alternative to Levy we get this response what about abramovich or mansoor i dont think they have done to bad have they.
BSoDL Autoresponse:Yeah i know but the fact is they have come in and won stuff and are doing ok not everyone is a bad owner.
BSoDL Autoresponse:
- Be careful who you wish for.
- The grass isn't always greener.
- Who do YOU want to be chairman then?
- We're punching at our weight.
- We've punched above our weight,
It´s because winning one trophy in 14 years is shit and there isn´t an affective argument against that.Yeah that is the response that is always trotted out i just dont get it.
It´s because winning one trophy in 14 years is shit and there isn´t an affective argument against that.
I refuse to accept them because I don't find them to be affective arguments. One trophy in 14 years is terrible even some of Levy's supporters accept that it's not good enough.There is and they've been posted relentlessly. You just refuse to accept them.
I refuse to accept them because I don't find them to be affective arguments. One trophy in 14 years is terrible even some of Levy's supporters accept that it's not good enough.
Yep and as I said in a previous post it was arguably just as tough if not tougher in Sugars day.The usual argument is that Levy couldnt envisisage Chelsea or city getting big but by that notion one day palace,Qpr or Norwich might pass us by will we still use that as an excuse.
There is and they've been posted relentlessly. You just refuse to accept them.
Would prefer the Abramovich type thank you very much. We can of course keep the status quo seeing as your a big fan of Levy and his distinguished trophy laden dynasty.We could always go for a Peter Risdale type who took Leeds to the brink of extinction if you think that's a better option.