- Jun 8, 2004
- 8,737
- 16,971
This! Best defensive record as well!We're second in the league and unbeaten. FUK ALL DA HATERZ
This! Best defensive record as well!We're second in the league and unbeaten. FUK ALL DA HATERZ
This! Best defensive record as well!
I think that the only difference is that there were always misgivings about AVB from a lot of fans from the word go whereas even though the performances haven't perhaps matched the results this season, there is definitely a belief in Poch from the vast majority of fans so there is far more reason to be optimistic.I take it that was your view when when were 3rd after 6 games in AVBs disastrous second season? As with then there is little sense in simply looking at results and ignoring the faults and warning signs with the side. The team has seen good results so far but hasn't matched that with performances. Supporters should and m have every right to be concerned by that.
Wish I could double agree with this post.Anybody with a 'glass half empty' attitude when we are sitting second in the league after 6 matches and when we remain unbeaten needs a slap round the bake as they say in our part of the world.
And we are yet to beat a good side in this season. Lost against monaco and drew against everton n pool... consider that
They beat utd... won their cl match... we drew against two team that are more or less comparable to us and lost against a cl caliber team... we won 4 games in the league and 3 of them arep relegation fodder... i would have counted us commensurate with city if we would have won against liverpool or everton or monaco... we did not... so there's a lot of work yet to be done and we are not as the same page with city...What are we considering? What point are you making that we haven't been tested yet? Surely the fact that we are currently in 2nd place counts for something where the majority of our rivals haven't found the consistency we have.
Does the fact that we are without Dembele for most of our matches mesn anything to you? We haven't looked good but yet we are churning out favourable results or doesn't it count? Yet City are crusing in first place yet they have played mostly weaker opponents...or don't they count?
They beat utd... won their cl match... we drew against two team that are more or less comparable to us and lost against a cl caliber team... we won 4 games in the league and 3 of them arep relegation fodder... i would have counted us commensurate with city if we would have won against liverpool or everton or monaco... we did not... so there's a lot of work yet to be done and we are not as the same page with city...
Because they have won matches not only against relegation fodders(sunderland, stoke etc) but also against good teams like(utd, monchengladbach,swansea) and while we won against relegation fodders like sunderland , stoke we drew or lost against good teams like pool/everton/monaco... that is the difference ...The fact that we are a one half good/one bad half team yet we are 2nd must count for something then? It's a bit silly playing us down and praising City when City have played 5 out of the bottom 7 teams as well, if you're going to count the matches we played against relegation fodder then why are you outright dismissing City's matches against them?
No one is saying that we are on the same page, it's just that we aren't getting deserved praise and people like yourself are uncessarily playing Spurs' start to the season down too easily, for whatever reason I don't know.
Because they have won matches not only against relegation fodders(sunderland, stoke etc) but also against good teams like(utd, monchengladbach,swansea) and while we won against relegation fodders like sunderland , stoke we drew or lost against good teams like pool/everton/monaco... that is the difference ...