Group E: GER/JP/SPA/CR

[cwy21]

its literally out though, you do know from higher angles the ball gets wider right? The ball would have been out, and with the height of that camera shot the width of the ball will be making it look like its in.
View attachment 119629

You cant use an angle not on the line to argue its out.

 

[nidge]

This popped up on my twitter feed.

 

[chrissivad]

 

[chrissivad]

This popped up on my twitter feed.

There are a few like this on there now.

 

[Yid-ol]

its literally out though, you do know from higher angles the ball gets wider right? The ball would have been out, and with the height of that camera shot the width of the ball will be making it look like its in.
View attachment 119629

Why would the width of a ball make it's length be in? That's the wrong direction for it to be bigger!

 

[chrissivad]

@Fredo what are you disagreeing about an image?

 

[Marty]

@Fredo what are you disagreeing about an image?

Showing a lack of understanding of the nature of a spherical object.

 

[Fredo]

@Fredo what are you disagreeing about an image?

You're using it as proof its within the line - which is completely inaccurate and false.

 

[Archibald&Crooks]

Out. All day long

 

[DarwinSpur]

if you ask me that should be classed as out idc, thats bollocks the ball is literally out, even if its in by 1mm

If you ask me the on-field decision to guess that it was out is the true controversy here.

 

[chrissivad]

You're using it as proof its within the line - which is completely inaccurate and false.

I posted it because it's a clearer image.
I made no comment on it

 

[Fredo]

I posted it because it's a clearer image.
I made no comment on it

Fair enough then, my bad, removed

 

[chrissivad]

Fair enough then, my bad, removed

In or out it's a very close call, looks like mm's
That image might not even show the furthest point the ball went out.

Most people wanted a 'if it's not clear' then give the advantage to the attacker.

 

[DiamondLites]

Japan have unveiled their new national flag

 

[Gassin's finest]

 

[EireYid]

I personally feel it should be that if no part of the ball is touching the line it should be considered out but that's just a personal opinion. Really pisses me off for some reason when corners are taken and no part of the ball is touching the line ?

 

[dontcallme]

Kind of pisses me off that after all the drama that has happened in the group, all anyone is talking about is a refereeing decision.

 

[cwy21]

Camera angle is everything.

 

[bubble07]

In or out it's a very close call, looks like mm's
That image might not even show the furthest point the ball went out.

Most people wanted a 'if it's not clear' then give the advantage to the attacker.

But it wasn't clear and obvious so VAR should have went with onfield decision

 

[chrissivad]

But it wasn't clear and obvious so VAR should have went with onfield decision

People keep bringing this up with VAR, but like offsides, that's not how VAR is being used.

VAR will say if it onside or offside. In play or not. Clear and obvious doesn't play a part in it.