What's new

"Harry's Frustration" - Article

NEVILLEB

Well-Known Member
Nov 6, 2006
6,772
6,398
Giuseppe Rossi snub puts dent in Tottenham manager Harry Redknapp's title hopes
By MATT BARLOW
Last updated at 10:58 PM on 1st February 2011
Comments (0)
Add to My Stories

Having been mugged in Madrid earlier in the month, Harry Redknapp then spent the final days of January trying to force £35million on someone in Spain. The attempt failed and Redknapp gave the impression that the experience had been every bit as awful as having his pockets emptied outside Atletico Madrid's Vicente Calderon Stadium.
As the dust settled on Monday's spending frenzy, Tottenham's manager was plainly annoyed that rival managers Carlo Ancelotti, Roberto Mancini and Kenny Dalglish all had new strike options, while he had acquired only Steven Pienaar in midfield and Bongani Khumalo at the back.
Redknapp had spoken boldly of a title challenge at the turn of the year and wanted chairman Daniel Levy to back his ambition with a statement signing. Yesterday, he explained the will had been there to spend more than £30m on a top striker but it had proved impossible.

The one that got away: Villarreal weren't lured by Tottenham's lucre
Manchester City beat them to Edin Dzeko, Liverpool to Andy Carroll. Redknapp had second thoughts about Luis Suarez, Diego Forlan and Sergio Aguero proved too costly, and Villarreal refused to sell Giuseppe Rossi.
By the time Levy turned his focus to the consolation of Phil Neville and Charlie Adam, his offers were too little and too late, and Redknapp's patience was tested.
Asked why Tottenham did not move for Blackpool midfielder Adam until 20 minutes before Monday's 11pm deadline, the manager shrugged and said: 'Pass.' Pushed, he added: 'It was late. I can't answer that. I don't want to start criticising.'
Asked why the opening bid for Neville had been only £500,000 - an offer Everton boss David Moyes branded 'disrespectful' - Redknapp said: 'Yes, it was a pretty low offer for a good player. I can't argue with that.'
Confusingly, Levy seemed desperate to satisfy the request for more firepower. 'He wanted to bring someone in for big money,' said Redknapp. ' If Villarreal would've sold Rossi, we would've brought him in. I think he offered £35m in the end. Villarreal just didn't want to sell him.


Late license: Spurs failed in bids for Neville (left) and Adam (right)
'He asked me if I wanted Suarez the other week and I felt he was a top player, but he plays as a second striker and I've got (Rafael) van der Vaart. We needed a Forlan or a Carroll or a Rossi.
'Carroll would've been a good signing for us. Forlan was a deal we couldn't do. He was on £140,000 a week - massive money - and they wanted £15m, and he's 31, nearly 32. There's only a return if he takes you into the Champions League again.'
There is plenty of scope for friction between a manager's selfish preference for seasoned players with quality guarantees and a board's pursuit of careful investment in younger players with sell-on value.
'It's hard to change,' said Redknapp, who can point to the success of Van der Vaart, 27, and William Gallas, 33, compared to 21-year-old Brazil midfielder Sandro and 24- year-old South Africa defender Khumalo, who have been slower to adapt.
Spurs are short of defenders and Jonathan Woodgate will start his first game in 15 months at Blackburn tonight if Gallas is not fit, but Khumalo, signed from Supersport United last month, is not ready for the Premier League.
Levy might counter the argument with Gareth Bale and Luka Modric, both worth several times what the club paid for them. But eating away at Redknapp is the fear that a quiet January will cost Spurs the Champions League football which lured Van der Vaart to White Hart Lane and might keep Bale and Modric at the club.
'Our task is harder now, for sure,' he said before dashing to Italy to watch European opponents AC Milan last night. 'At the start of the window, I felt the title was up for grabs. It's getting harder because the other teams have strengthened their squads. 'You look at Chelsea now and think they could win the league. We've got to keep going. It's going to be hard but not impossible.'
 

alpha

Well-Known Member
Jun 27, 2005
1,142
870
I guess it's just the way the cookie crumbled.

Surprised we didn't go all out for Hulk.
 

3Dnata

Well-Known Member
Oct 5, 2008
5,879
1,345
That's shocking what he says on Saurez.
Harry doesn't seem happy there and he seems more upset about not getting Neville than his error of judgement over Saurez.
 

adiepf

Well-Known Member
May 13, 2007
2,444
255
Giuseppe Rossi snub puts dent in Tottenham manager Harry Redknapp's title hopes
By MATT BARLOW
Last updated at 10:58 PM on 1st February 2011
Comments (0)
Add to My Stories

Having been mugged in Madrid earlier in the month, Harry Redknapp then spent the final days of January trying to force £35million on someone in Spain. The attempt failed and Redknapp gave the impression that the experience had been every bit as awful as having his pockets emptied outside Atletico Madrid's Vicente Calderon Stadium.
As the dust settled on Monday's spending frenzy, Tottenham's manager was plainly annoyed that rival managers Carlo Ancelotti, Roberto Mancini and Kenny Dalglish all had new strike options, while he had acquired only Steven Pienaar in midfield and Bongani Khumalo at the back.
Redknapp had spoken boldly of a title challenge at the turn of the year and wanted chairman Daniel Levy to back his ambition with a statement signing. Yesterday, he explained the will had been there to spend more than £30m on a top striker but it had proved impossible.

The one that got away: Villarreal weren't lured by Tottenham's lucre
Manchester City beat them to Edin Dzeko, Liverpool to Andy Carroll. Redknapp had second thoughts about Luis Suarez, Diego Forlan and Sergio Aguero proved too costly, and Villarreal refused to sell Giuseppe Rossi.
By the time Levy turned his focus to the consolation of Phil Neville and Charlie Adam, his offers were too little and too late, and Redknapp's patience was tested.
Asked why Tottenham did not move for Blackpool midfielder Adam until 20 minutes before Monday's 11pm deadline, the manager shrugged and said: 'Pass.' Pushed, he added: 'It was late. I can't answer that. I don't want to start criticising.'
Asked why the opening bid for Neville had been only £500,000 - an offer Everton boss David Moyes branded 'disrespectful' - Redknapp said: 'Yes, it was a pretty low offer for a good player. I can't argue with that.'
Confusingly, Levy seemed desperate to satisfy the request for more firepower. 'He wanted to bring someone in for big money,' said Redknapp. ' If Villarreal would've sold Rossi, we would've brought him in. I think he offered £35m in the end. Villarreal just didn't want to sell him.


Late license: Spurs failed in bids for Neville (left) and Adam (right)
'He asked me if I wanted Suarez the other week and I felt he was a top player, but he plays as a second striker and I've got (Rafael) van der Vaart. We needed a Forlan or a Carroll or a Rossi.
'Carroll would've been a good signing for us. Forlan was a deal we couldn't do. He was on £140,000 a week - massive money - and they wanted £15m, and he's 31, nearly 32. There's only a return if he takes you into the Champions League again.'
There is plenty of scope for friction between a manager's selfish preference for seasoned players with quality guarantees and a board's pursuit of careful investment in younger players with sell-on value.
'It's hard to change,' said Redknapp, who can point to the success of Van der Vaart, 27, and William Gallas, 33, compared to 21-year-old Brazil midfielder Sandro and 24- year-old South Africa defender Khumalo, who have been slower to adapt.
Spurs are short of defenders and Jonathan Woodgate will start his first game in 15 months at Blackburn tonight if Gallas is not fit, but Khumalo, signed from Supersport United last month, is not ready for the Premier League.
Levy might counter the argument with Gareth Bale and Luka Modric, both worth several times what the club paid for them. But eating away at Redknapp is the fear that a quiet January will cost Spurs the Champions League football which lured Van der Vaart to White Hart Lane and might keep Bale and Modric at the club.
'Our task is harder now, for sure,' he said before dashing to Italy to watch European opponents AC Milan last night. 'At the start of the window, I felt the title was up for grabs. It's getting harder because the other teams have strengthened their squads. 'You look at Chelsea now and think they could win the league. We've got to keep going. It's going to be hard but not impossible.'

again as i was told, we were actively in the hunt for suarez:cry:
 

andyw362

New Member
Oct 16, 2005
993
0
Fair enough HR is probably right about Suarez.

But surely there are more front men in Europe than 4 in Spain.

Anyone would be an improvement.
 

Kendall

Well-Known Member
Feb 8, 2007
38,502
11,933
To be fair, I can understand why levy would be reluctant to buy yet another right back and yet another CM.
 

Kendall

Well-Known Member
Feb 8, 2007
38,502
11,933
and why does it mention Khumalo in that article? he's been with us about a fortnight.
 

kaz Hirai

Well-Known Member
Nov 5, 2008
17,692
25,340
indeed if i was levy i would have offered 50k to everton, "sorry i tried harry :grin:"

why do we need an ancient and average right back when we have a good one in corluka, and 2 potentially good young ones.
i suppose harry thinks because he's a winner, great experience and all that. dont seem to recall him winning to much at everton and he was a bit part player at united, Gallas is a winner with experience not neville
as for charlie adams, well thats just a joke, how many centre mids do we want, especially one that isnt going to improve the starting 11
 

Acid

In Limbo
Sep 10, 2005
420
211
indeed if i was levy i would have offered 50k to everton, "sorry i tried harry :grin:"

why do we need an ancient and average right back when we have a good one in corluka, and 2 potentially good young ones.
i suppose harry thinks because he's a winner, great experience and all that. dont seem to recall him winning to much at everton and he was a bit part player at united, Gallas is a winner with experience not neville
as for charlie adams, well thats just a joke, how many centre mids do we want, especially one that isnt going to improve the starting 11

i thought phill was a left back not a right back?
 

fortworthspur

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2007
11,248
17,550
that doesn't really paint a very pretty picture. we look a tad indecisive about the plan.
 

Acid

In Limbo
Sep 10, 2005
420
211
He's what you might call a utility player. Usually plays at right back for Everton these days.

Ah I see, my bad, I had seen him play as a DMC a few times for Everton but for some reason not paid attention when he has been at right back.

As left back cover I could of seen him being useful, not much else though for us. Possibly that was the logic behind it, otherwise the next best option is to put Bale in that position when you need him playing as a left winger to contribute goals?
 

KentuckyYid

*Eyes That See*
May 11, 2005
13,013
2,265
Did we even try for Llorente? He's that kind of player and a good one too but didn't get a mention.
 

lifeof...

Well-Known Member
Mar 18, 2005
2,073
248
Some interesting quotes from Harry, Really does suggest to me, our transfer "policy" and method does need looking at
 

am_yisrael_chai

Well-Known Member
Feb 18, 2006
6,409
10,931
It is all a smokescreen for the fact 1) the chairman doesn't want to break our wage ceiling, pointless being willing to pay 35mil in a fee i you won't pay above 70k per week in wages, and 2) the manager won't end his love affair with defoe and crouch as witnessed by his SSN interview where he said crouch had been fantastic for us this season, which was about as accurate as saying hosnei mubarak is popular in Egypt right now.
 

EastLondonYid

Well-Known Member
Jan 26, 2010
7,837
16,145
Our tranfer policy seems a little strange in this window.

We either made offers for players we clearly couldn't afford, wages or fee.Rossi.Forlan.
Offers like 250,000 that were an insult to the player concerned.Neville.
Offers with no time to conclude.Adams.

Tbh, it was the perfect policy if you really didn't want to buy!

They were all totally different players, playing in totally different positions.

Good to see we knew exactly what we needed and how much money we had to really spend.

No other top club operates in this manner, with the manager constantly repeating he hasn't a clue and that the chairman is dealing with it and suprising him,i hope this is all part of the levy-harry plan, but its getting abit boring, especially when it spectacularly fails like this window.
 

lifeof...

Well-Known Member
Mar 18, 2005
2,073
248
Our tranfer policy seems a little strange in this window.

We either made offers for players we clearly couldn't afford, wages or fee.Rossi.Forlan.
Offers like 250,000 that were an insult to the player concerned.Neville.
Offers with no time to conclude.Adams.

Tbh, it was the perfect policy if you really didn't want to buy!

They were all totally different players, playing in totally different positions.

Good to see we knew exactly what we needed and how much money we had to really spend.

No other top club operates in this manner, with the manager constantly repeating he hasn't a clue and that the chairman is dealing with it and suprising him,i hope this is all part of the levy-harry plan, but its getting abit boring, especially when it spectacularly fails like this window.


I dont know how true that is, but it is what needs to be addressed imo
 

Wsussexspur

Well-Known Member
Oct 2, 2007
8,918
10,176
Our whole transfer policy needs reviewing. Of course villareal are not going to sell us there star player on transfer deadline day! Why would they when they are challenging for a champions league place. These deals should have been put in to action at the start of the window not in the last 48 hours of it!
 

jamesc0le

SISS:LOKO:plays/thinks/eats chicken like sissoko!
Jun 17, 2008
4,974
944
levy n redknapp realise the pressing need for a strong, powerful forward player. less of a priority but still a high priority is a smaller faster goalgetter. suarez was overpriced, seriously , why would anyone pay over 20 million for a dutch league hotshot. he could be great here, he could quite as easily flop. levy obviously started paniccing and bidding for the smaller players (rossi,aguero) as well as the bigger ones (llorente,negredo,carroll) with a view to at the very least getting a lower priority type player in and dealing with the highest priority in the summer.

but the clubs can see spurs need these players badly and so they tried to get us to pay all the taxes and fees on top of the high fees.

these things happen, no big deal.
 
Top