- Oct 19, 2004
- 39,837
- 50,713
My point was, once we knew what our squad was going to be (so this was following the losses against both Manchester teams at the beginning of the season).
No-one not even the most optimistic of Spurs fans - even knowing the personnel involved - predicted or thought that we would be in the position we are now.
We're potentially getting caught up in semantics. At the beginning of the season my expectations were to be challenging for a top 4 place, in and around the 5th place mark.
They were fairly lofty considering the mood on this messageboard.
The point I'm obviously struggling to get across is that, given those considerations, given those initial viewpoints, to find ourselves where we are now is above and beyond those expectations.
Purely by simple definition of words, we have over-achieved. If our expections were X, and the reality is X+1 (better), that's just simply correct!!
But that would only be true if we went back in time. Perspective alters with time and circumstances. We might be overachieving based on what you expected before we'd kicked a ball this season, but that's not the same as over achieving what the team is clearly capable of achieving based on the factors we know now.
What you are doing is making excuses based on the presumption that you are still at your initial knowledge point having not learnt that we are in fact better than your initial perspective told you.