- Feb 27, 2005
- 6,258
- 5,043
If there was any hint that Ter Stegen might be available, i'm sure we'd give it a shot, along with every other club in Europe.
but there is no context.I do think that such things as pass success rate are relevant in this case given how important a "sweeper keeper" is to AVB's intended method of play. Of course that's not to say that there aren't some other more important aspects of goalkeeping unshown amongst those stats, but those displayed are not insignificant imo.
yeah, you may be right.. but he has more plaudits than hart at this stage. i think people who watch training etc will have seen him play a lot more than us and so hopefully will make a balanced decisionEr, ok, if you like...
If we spend £7m on him and he doesn't make the grade as you put it, who is going to buy him off us for the same sort of money we paid for him?
7m isn't reasonable in my eyes. You use Hart as an example of how this deal could work yet he cost under a million didn't he?
If Butland has a good season as Brums number 1 then £7m is justified, perhaps a little more, but I can't see us spunking that much on someone as unproven as he is. We don't have billions we can throw about.
ahhhh... but you see nedley, some 'experts' on here say he is 'not prem standard' or 'unproven at premiership level', therefore not worth 7m. i can only assume that those of us who have actually seen him play are missing something.
I don't think it is incorrect to say be IS unproven at PL and £7M is a hell of a lot of money for a keeper with his experience. That is not to say it could not shrewd in a few years time, but it is hard to judge him. I mean, Ian Walker looked magic at 18-19 and he turned out to be an absolute turd.ahhhh... but you see nedley, some 'experts' on here say he is 'not prem standard' or 'unproven at premiership level', therefore not worth 7m. i can only assume that those of us who have actually seen him play are missing something.
Great 45 mins from him tonight.
My sunday league keeper - who knows his onions when it comes to football says he is the best young keeper he's ever seen live.
He's a season ticket holder at Cheltenham.
well, sure.. he hasn't played in the premiership, or a top league, so he is 'unproven' if you are being literal. But the world is a little less cut and dried than that. it's not quite like walker (who wasn't a bad keeper even after 19yo! not worlds best, but certainly prem standard!), as ask anyone who coach/pundit/manager/player has worked with or watched JB and you'll hear the same message from all of them. and my eyes haven't told me any different.I don't think it is incorrect to say be IS unproven at PL and £7M is a hell of a lot of money for a keeper with his experience. That is not to say it could not shrewd in a few years time, but it is hard to judge him. I mean, Ian Walker looked magic at 18-19 and he turned out to be an absolute turd.
in the meantime we have Brad! i would be happy to go with Brad for one more year.Absolute yes from me. Even if he turns out to be a disaster (which he wouldn't), then we could probably get half our money back. All the reports so far have been excellent.
Only thing is what do you do in the meantime? I reckon play hardball - Lloris for 12m Euros or forget it. We will get him for that if we buy Butland.
An hour ago lloris was the best think since sliced bread - now butland is the one! Butland would be a cheaper bet!
ahhhh... but you see nedley, some 'experts' on here say he is 'not prem standard' or 'unproven at premiership level', therefore not worth 7m. i can only assume that those of us who have actually seen him play are missing something.