- Jan 20, 2006
- 45,213
- 8,229
I had exactly this argument in the summer, Which is why at the time I highlighted the fact that Defoe's actual goals per minute ratio was better than Bent's. I highlighted this because, I argued and maintain still, is a far better way of assessing strikers as meriting what denotes a chance and even then what does it matter if a striker is making more chances for himself than the other stiker who only waits for great chances to come along. At the end of the day games are limited by time not chances. And Defoe manages more goals per minute.
This rather fell through when it turned out that Mido's GPM was considerably better than Defoe's in 2005-2006. And he needed fewer shots for every goal. And Mido's a bit shit, isn't he?