- Jan 23, 2006
- 26,967
- 45,257
I have to (slightly) stick up for Mullers here.
He (hopefully) isn't claiming that there are many visible signs of racism in football. That's pretty clear. There are plenty of excellent black footballers. In fact, put together a 'Best of the Premier League, Black Vs White' game and the whites would struggle despite their being more of them.
Anyway, where there IS racism - as I demonstrated earlier - is in the Boardroom. And all of you thinking of Levy, Glazers, Abramovich, etc, those AREN'T boardrooms. Those are bloody play factories for the rich and famous and really don't count. I mean places like Bury, Stockport, Tranmere, Rotherham, etc. I couldn't tell you who these Chairman are now, and I've chosen them arbitrarily from areas that I know - for cast-iron fact - are likely to have owners in their 60s, 70s and 80s, who don't share the values of every poster in this thread. They won't actively display racism because they understand the negative PR, but behind closed doors and even in rooms with black people their language would shock and stun most right-thinking people.
They are bigots, sexists, chauvanists, and, yes, racists.
mullers did say there is Institutionalized racism in the game and that means that it is rife, all pervasive and dictates all decisions made in the game which is clearly not the case.
Moreover be careful what you say Bill, are you saying that black players are better than white players? what are you basing this on because I hope to God you are not basing this on any strereotypical idea that black people are naturally more athletic than white people because that would imply racial differences and mullers would infer subtle racism from that.