- Jan 20, 2006
- 45,213
- 8,229
The whole of Europe will be shitting themselves from the very thought of coming up against those two.
In Bent's case, rightly so. Don't know about Campbell.
The whole of Europe will be shitting themselves from the very thought of coming up against those two.
They didn't want to be here. Well, we were initially told by several ITKs that Keane would be happy to stay if we didn't want to sell, but clearly we decided to cash in. If we haven't directly replaced him there's enough firepower and creativity in the midfield to compensate.
Veloso didn't want to come. What do you fail to understand about that? Apart from anything else, SC members who've actually watched him play regularly (and a lot of Portugeezers) reckon he's not all that anyway.
Maybe you should learn to distinguish between FM and real life.
you seem to trust what the itks say over the keane issue but not the veloso....i heared it was the wages that we stubbled on! and keane handed in a transfer request wich i have showed you twice from the official site and you still seem to belive this itk talk
In Bent's case, rightly so. Don't know about Campbell.
wheres the other 9 people that voted he should go i need some back up lol.
dc75 yes i see what your saying and i did agree with everything you say....until i realise the game is ALL about money now and unless you splash it you wont reach the top......man u....chelsea the top 2 clubs in england and they both have the highest wage bills.....spend alot of cash on players too, liverpool and arsenal have high wage structures but havnt really spent that big & thats why they wont win the league untill they do
wheres the other 9 people that voted he should go i need some back up lol.
dc75 yes i see what your saying and i did agree with everything you say....until i realise the game is ALL about money now and unless you splash it you wont reach the top......man u....chelsea the top 2 clubs in england and they both have the highest wage bills.....spend alot of cash on players too, liverpool and arsenal have high wage structures but havnt really spent that big & thats why they wont win the league untill they do
I spoke to a life long Citeh fan at work today who is very unhappy about the takeover. He thinks it will undermine everything that he feels Citeh stand for. Family club, local fans and youth development. He feels that in his eyes it pisses on everying that the club has stood for all his life and if they go down that route he might as well have made the choice when he was a kid to support the other lot.
I feel deeply and emotionally attached (unhinged) to Spurs. For many years I believed we always tried to play the game the right way, while that lot up the road (that smell) bored teams into submission. When the anti-christ became our manager and turned us into THEM, I felt betrayed. Depite not being as succesful it was this dignity and style which made MY team special.
The beautiful game is about more than winning and more than money.
Just a quick point on the 'why can't we have some rich type'...firstly, if it was that easy why did none of the tycoons who bought clubs buy Spurs...and secondly, FIFA/UEFA are seriously looking at whether they can push through a financial system with restrictions on what can be spent (based potentially on the actual income & balance sheets of clubs from that income) to level the playing field a bit - and if that goes through, it doesn't matter how much a club's owner has because it won't mean a damn thing!
Which, if it happens, means Levy has put us in a fantastic position by making sure we're one of the few debt-free clubs!!
to be honest mate can you blame us........we are nothing but a mid table and a feeder to the sky 4
are you getting so old you cant sense sarcasm