Spurs have announced they have reached a private deal with Archway that will allow them to take over the land next year.By later this year, they mean by the weekend right?
Say some papers..
Spurs have announced they have reached a private deal with Archway that will allow them to take over the land next year.By later this year, they mean by the weekend right?
I wouldn't be so 'churlish' as to mark down your post with a disagree also, but that article you point me to states no stadium with a capacity of less than 60k has been chosen since 2006. As it happens the stadium in Turin qualifies for the criteria with a capacity of 30k, and the Wiki you've just shown me says just 8K for a cat 4.
I've also just read that Platini now wants every stadium that hosts a final to now have a minimum of 70k.
Obviously my secondhand 'found' info was also incorrect when I posted it and for which I offer the humblest apologies
So what do you disagree with then, the amount of spectators as your info is also incorrect, the fact we may get into a 'stadium war' or that we should build a stadium that's appropriate and considered for Spurs? Just curious.
Our intention is to move the already consented car parking into the basement level, alongside plant and furniture storage, in order to allow us to free up space at the ground floor level to be allocated to other operational requirements including enhanced media facilities and extended player changing areas.
You do realise that a disagree rating isn't negative. It just states that I disagree as I had different information.
You can disagree with my post it's ok. Fill your boots. I wont cry. I certainly wont think it churlish, i would just understand that you disagreed.
Here read this and tell me what is right.
http://www.uefa.org/MultimediaFiles...ions/General/01/74/38/69/1743869_DOWNLOAD.pdf
So we're taking over the land later this year. Assuming this means sometime during the 4th quarter, then we'll demolish the site.We also need to get this minor changes application approved and then we will have to submit an application for a major change to the design and capacity as well. If all goes well, hopefully we get both applications approved in a timely manner.
I doubt we'll be starting any development on the soil/piling on the archway site until sometime in the 1st quarter of 2016. I think my assumptive 19/20 season move in date continues to look more likely.
So we're taking over the land later this year. Assuming this means sometime during the 4th quarter, then we'll demolish the site.We also need to get this minor changes application approved and then we will have to submit an application for a major change to the design and capacity as well. If all goes well, hopefully we get both applications approved in a timely manner.
I doubt we'll be starting any development on the soil/piling on the archway site until sometime in the 1st quarter of 2016. I think my assumptive 19/20 season move in date continues to look more likely.
I'm no surveyor but I would imagine that the depth will not need to be changed just for a basement... The pilings go down far enough to find solid (enough) ground. Digging out a basement alongside the pilings shouldn't make any difference to how deep the solid ground is....As we've planning on adding a basement level for parking etc, presumably we have to dig down far deeper so we can't have done piling yet.
I'm no surveyor but I would imagine that the depth will not need to be changed just for a basement... The pilings go down far enough to find solid (enough) ground. Digging out a basement alongside the pilings shouldn't make any difference to how deep the solid ground is....
But I am happy to be told different.
I can't believe that anyone is planning a new Basement at this late stage – particularly as I know that there were difficulties with water-level in the original non-podium design.As we've planning on adding a basement level for parking etc, presumably we have to dig down far deeper so we can't have done piling yet.
I can't believe that anyone is planning a new Basement at this late stage – particularly as I know that there were difficulties with water-level in the original non-podium design.
It read to me as a pre-existing (planned) Basement Level, because the Project Update says “alongside plant and furniture storage”. In other words, parking will be incorporated into spare space in the area currently set aside for plant and furniture storage. No?
if the rumour that its to accomodate bigger NFL player & cheerleader changing rooms on the surface is true.
And to think some cynics were suggesting Levy was just doing this for the money. Now we see the grand plan unfold.
I don't know... I think that this...
suggests that the capacity will be increased...
Save the cheerleader save the world.And to think some cynics were suggesting Levy was just doing this for the money. Now we see the grand plan unfold.
I'm pretty sure those are the exact same quotes that were in the update yesterday.little bit more from Daniel Levi in the International business Times I've copied the extra, to me anyway, quote from DL.
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/tottenham-reach-crucial-new-stadium-agreement-metal-company-1494542?
Upon the announcement of the private agreement between Tottenham and Archway, chairman Daniel Levy said: "Our commitment is to find the best solution for the Club, our supporters and our community. It will be our new home for many years to come and we want it to be world class.
"We are aware that both our fans and the local community are eager to see the stadium delivered as soon as possible and we shall be working to do so.
"I must however urge patience in the interests of getting the best possible outcome for all and ensuring that we progress diligently. It is a hugely complex and large-scale project."
I'm pretty sure those are the exact same quotes that were in the update yesterday.