- Dec 3, 2004
- 15,506
- 5,032
"Plan B" is called that for a reason. It's not Plan A.
Was that copy and pasted for a job application for ITV Sport?
"Plan B" is called that for a reason. It's not Plan A.
I'm not going to slate Crouch as I think he has done enough to earn the respect of our fans with his assists and the few goals he has scored and also his experience in the champions league will be a big help to the rest of the squad but he does have his weaknesses.
Can't generate any power whatsoever in his shot and is easily marked. Saturdays game against Everton proved it. If he is marked out of the game then our chances of scoring go down dramatically as he is our target man at the mo. He is also physically weak so it's easy for him to be shoved out of the way.
We do need at least 2 top quality strikers then I believe we will be almost complete and out of the 4 strikers we have, if I was manager I would sell Crouch and Keane.
Not going to slate him as I said before as without him we most probably would'nt be in the position we are in now and to call him shit is way OTT.
The trouble is right now, if Crouch is plan B, then we don't have a plan A, just two plan C's.
I don't get the Crouch knocking. Without Crouch where would we be this season right now? Zero-one point in the CL and hovering mid table in the EPL.
If we had great other options, other strikers who offered more to the team dynamic you could all be on firmer ground but Defoe and Pav are decent strikers who are fucking lightweight footballers.
Crouch right now is the best option we have to get the best out of people like VDV and Bale.
When we sign Ibrahimavich or Torres and REdknapp still picks Crouch you can knock him, until then engage some common sense.
Crouch works bloody hard for the team in every game, takes a lot of punishment from defences, and creates a nuisance for the opposition every time. Many defences may be able to get the measure of him, but he never ever makes it easy for them. Ok he's not Van Basten, or even Berbatov for that matter, but his selflessness and canny knack for scoring important goals means he should get more respect than he's deserving here.
Crouch-potato'
Was that copy and pasted for a job application for ITV Sport?
The trouble is right now, if Crouch is plan B, then we don't have a plan A, just two plan C's.
I don't get the Crouch knocking. Without Crouch where would we be this season right now? Zero-one point in the CL and hovering mid table in the EPL.
If we had great other options, other strikers who offered more to the team dynamic you could all be on firmer ground but Defoe and Pav are decent strikers who are fucking lightweight footballers.
Crouch right now is the best option we have to get the best out of people like VDV and Bale.
When we sign Ibrahimavich or Torres and REdknapp still picks Crouch you can knock him, until then engage some common sense.
ITS not good enough....BUT... crouch played his part in the most succesfull season we have ever had in the prem....
He scored and played in both games against city, and they couldn't handle him..so lets give him some credit!!
If we get champs league again, and crouch only gets 7,8,9 goals...who fucking cares???
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2010/oct/25/five-things-we-learned-this-weekend
Don't know if this has been posted...
1) The Premier League can deal with Peter Crouch
Crouch had a peculiar game against Everton on Saturday. Aggressively double marked at set pieces, with one defender in front and one behind, he was repeatedly buffeted to the ground as the ball was delivered, losing out not by foul play but by his own inability to compete at the jostling and ground-standing aspects of what is still a contact sport. By the end Crouch appeared to have spent most of the game either flat on his back or appealing to the referee for a (non-existent) foul. He did set up Rafael van der Vaart's tap-in with a deflection off his thigh. He also never stopped trying. But the increasing impression is that Crouch may be a busted flush at this level.
Here are the headline stats: in the past three seasons Crouch has scored 10 goals in 84 Premier League matches. In other competitions, against teams less familiar with his strength and weaknesses, he has scored 22 goals in 37 games. This is an astonishing disparity in strike rates, particularly given that most "other" games are either internationals or European matches. It suggests that Premier League teams know how to cope with Crouch; that as a player he has failed to develop new strings and tricks; and that perhaps he is now finding it difficult physically. We don't have much insight into the effects of age on the Crouch-style physique, mainly because the Crouch-style physique is pretty much confined to one man: Crouch. But at 29 the lack of pace looks to be becoming chronic. He seems less flexible too. Perhaps we should simply be praising Crouch's ability to extract a fine career against the odds. But the facts are plain: over the past three years Crouch has been the scourge of strangers while among friends he fails to make a mark.
Except Bent scored them in half the time Crouch did.Remember the way you used to feel about Darren Bent,I feel exactly the same about Peter Crouch.
He will score the odd goal and I will be euphoric in that moment but after that the reality kicks in again.
I feel exactly the same about him as I do of Jamie Carragher when he scores an o.g for us.
Thought Crouchy was a lot better last night.
Me too, however his decision making is still poor at times, I could not believe he didn't lay that ball on to VDV for a tap-in