I haven't seen this ITK, when was it?theres been new ITK that said that Levy is back in on handling transfers
Can't see him going to scotlandCould be because of dumfries interest?
*When Walker leftTo be fair it's a deal they can do quickly so FP might be checking other targets. The problem is we need a new RWB yesterday.
I know you don’t believe that…its the Spurs supporters self preservation mechanics at work…?Maybe Porro wasn’t Conte’s favoured choice and we’ve backed off as we’re now going to back the manager?
Let’s wait and see how this pans out.
He owes you at least a decade’s worth of therapy!Why the fuck did my dad make me support this fucking club
?? I’m just going by others mentioning Porro being a bit too lightweight for a Conte wingback and clinging to that.I know you don’t believe that…its the Spurs supporters self preservation mechanics at work…?
Got a bad feeling he’d cost more than he’s worth. He’d be good, no doubt, but that’s my big drawback with himCould be because of dumfries interest?
It doesn't say that, it may be Paratici making the decision with other options available for a more realistic fee or even just part of the negotiations.There it is Levys decision unsurprisingly not backing Conte
Maybe Porro wasn’t Conte’s favoured choice and we’ve backed off as we’re now going to back the manager?
Let’s wait and see how this pans out.
But I think the point seems to be that we aren’t willing to pay this £40mil release clause for a fairly proven player who pretty much exactly fits what we need.I havent seen much of Porro and one good game against us doesnt really allow me to have a judgement of him but from what ive been reading about him - how can dropping 40m on him not be considered as backing the manager? Because we cant get a Hakimi? The guy needs to be flexible too. There are thousands of players out there and a lot of RWBs to boot.
My point was in reference to the possibility that Conte favours other options over Porro. Hence the club may be backing Conte by giving him his first choice rather than going for club targets. I thought it was a fairly self explanatory post as if Conte favours others but the club signs alternatives it prefers then he’s not being backed.I havent seen much of Porro and one good game against us doesnt really allow me to have a judgement of him but from what ive been reading about him - how can dropping 40m on him not be considered as backing the manager? Because we cant get a Hakimi? The guy needs to be flexible too. There are thousands of players out there and a lot of RWBs to boot.
Trix has posted in the Conte thread on thisBut I think the point seems to be that we aren’t willing to pay this £40mil release clause for a fairly proven player who pretty much exactly fits what we need.
Fwiw Porro is not Conte's first choice but as compromises go it's one he is happy to go with as he rates him. I don't think we can read too much into it as far as backing Conte either way tbh.