- Jan 26, 2005
- 3,784
- 9,630
On another point Pulis after game press conference is pretty good.
http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/36069306
http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/36069306
I spam rate knee-jerk, agenda-driven posts, and you have a lot of previous with Eriksen. We get that you have a blind spot with his contributions -- there's no need to go on about it. And I don't know what you're talking about with Lamela as though it were an either/or thing. I think they've both been excellent this season and will be still better next. I suspect Poch thinks so too.Come on then @cliff jones @davidmatzdorf @boris @UpTownSpur, you've all rated my post as spam (not that I care about ratings as you can probably tell from my overall ratings), I'd love to hear your thoughts on how great Eriksen was and how terrible Lamela was. I suspect your replies will have some mentions of "involved in everything" or "lots of running" despite being myths but we'll wait and see.
I guess this comes off as I actually care about ratings but it's more about wondering what those who do actually think (does that make sense?).
He's created more scoring opportunities than anyone in the League with the exception of Ozil and assisted the second most goals in the league behind Ozil. This from a player who is still eligible for the Young Player of The Year. You're are so ridiculously far off in your critique of Erisken every week, how do you honestly not see his importance? We'd be nowhere near where we are if we din't have Eriksen this season.Come on then @cliff jones @davidmatzdorf @boris @UpTownSpur, you've all rated my post as spam (not that I care about ratings as you can probably tell from my overall ratings), I'd love to hear your thoughts on how great Eriksen was and how terrible Lamela was. I suspect your replies will have some mentions of "involved in everything" or "lots of running" despite being myths but we'll wait and see.
I guess this comes off as I actually care about ratings but it's more about wondering what those who do actually think (does that make sense?).
I spam rate knee-jerk, agenda-driven posts, and you have a lot of previous with Eriksen. We get that you have a blind spot with his contributions -- there's no need to go on about it. And I don't know what you're talking about with Lamela as though it were an either/or thing. I think they've both been excellent this season and will be still better next. I suspect Poch thinks so too.
He's created more scoring opportunities than anyone in the League with the exception of Ozil and assisted the second most goals in the league behind Ozil. This from a player who is still eligible for the Young Player of The Year. You're are so ridiculously far off in your critique of Erisken every week, how do you honestly not see his importance? We'd be nowhere near where we are if we din't have Eriksen this season.
You asked why I spam rated your comment and I told you why. That's the only point I needed to make.Ahh yes, so you have no real point to make, pretty standard from the ratings crew on here.
You asked why I spam rated your comment and I told you why. That's the only point I needed to make.
Haha what are you on about? Where did I say anything that resembles that?So what you're saying is if we played with 10 men we'd be doing worse, unless we had a player like Ozil (a player that has less assists than Milner this year). Ok, got it.
Haha what are you on about? Where did I say anything that resembles that?
Your argument is circular. So our most creative player creates the most chances -- isn't that a good thing? He also covers lot of ground and closes down the opposition's play -- you don't need crunching tackles to do that. Eriksen is more creative and Lamela is more aggressive -- they both have strengths and weaknesses. You're setting up a straw man by suggesting other people have Eriksen as the hero and Lamela as the fall guy, because they patently don't.I asked why Eriksen is so great not why you rated my comment as spam.
Once again, those using the argument that he's created the most chances might as well tell me how Lloris has made the most saves. We are the most dominant team in the league and he is supposed to be our most creative player (plus he takes 90% of set pieces). It's funny how everything bad that he does is instantly forgotten, such as his lack of willingness to beat Myhill to the ball or his shocking set pieces.
Because in our squad there is no alternative and I disagree that those guys, apart from Ozil, would eclipse him if they were in our squad. Payet has nowhere near the mobility or endurance levels as Eriksen and Willian and Mahrez are different types of players.You talk about Eriksen's importance as if there were no alternative. Put any other leading AM in that role in our dominant attacking team and they would eclipise Eriksen no issue. Payet, Ozil, Willian, Mahrez etc.
We weren't that bad!
Eriksen a close second? Second to every ball maybe.
Borks:
davidmatzdorf has asked me to say
that if you think he's not got anything better to do
than justify his ratings of your 'analysis'
a) You don't know him very well
b) Monday is clearing out the cat litter night.