- Jan 7, 2004
- 4,889
- 7,273
I was with a gooner mate on Saturday evening (I know, I feel dirty even saying it) and when conversation inevitably turned to football he came out with the line that Arsenal were massively over achieving given how much they've spent over the last 5 years whilst Spurs were under achieving because they'de spend so much more. After resisting the urge to punch him straight in the face I replied that it's nett spend which is the important figure and that given our turnover compared to Arsenal we were doing well to be competing with them at all. Obviously I didn't know the figures at the time, so having just looked them up to make sure I was right, I thought I'd share them with you so you can also tell you're gooner mates to go do one.
Now admittedly Arsenal are below us, but only just, and they're certainly not far enough behind us so that we'd have any sort of advantage over them.
P.S. Stoke?!?! WTF!
P.P.S. There's obviously wages to add to the equation but it's not shown on this table. Don't bother asking about wages because I haven't got that info and if you do ask I'll assume that it's some sort of homosexual code that you want to have sex with the person who posted above you. You have been warned
Now admittedly Arsenal are below us, but only just, and they're certainly not far enough behind us so that we'd have any sort of advantage over them.
P.S. Stoke?!?! WTF!
P.P.S. There's obviously wages to add to the equation but it's not shown on this table. Don't bother asking about wages because I haven't got that info and if you do ask I'll assume that it's some sort of homosexual code that you want to have sex with the person who posted above you. You have been warned
Last edited: