What's new

Suarez biting

$hoguN

Well-Known Member
Jul 25, 2005
26,678
34,823
I wonder what's the next mistermeaner wise for Suarez and what his next punishment will be?

That club are between a rock and a hard place. If they are looking to the best thing by the club then he should be sold.

There is little point in having a world class player when he is likely to miss games at the rate he does. This could also get worse in 13/14. He simply is a marked man.

No he is not. He is just an idiot who keeps doing outrageous things, there is a big difference. In 2.5 years in English football he has amassed half a season worth of bans and has been dragged in front of the FA 3 times (for making offensive gestures at Fulham fans, the Evra incident and now biting Ivanovic). None of those things have been the result of refs being unduly harsh on him, they are the result of him acting like a ****. He is also very lucky not to have been sent off several times for shocking challenges, like the one on Parker, and not to have picked up several more booking for simulation (especially when you consider Bale has been booked 5 times for this offence when 4 of them were clear fouls against him).
 

Dinghy

Well-Known Member
Jun 22, 2005
6,326
15,561
66805_365335673575482_1741544350_n.jpg
 

CJMurray

****
Aug 3, 2011
3,565
10,563
Will people please shut the fuck up telling Luis to leave the country.
to be honest I reckon he'll make his own decision

Suarez the player or Suarez the family man? No doubt the player will want to stay and prove another point next season - The family man however might have a hard time persuading his wife that all of this constant shite (yes he's partly responsible) is worth it.

he's partly responsible

he's partly responsible

he's partly responsible

he's partly responsible

he's partly responsible.




:banghead:
 

SteveH

BSoDL candidate for SW London
Jul 21, 2003
8,642
9,313
No he is not. He is just an idiot who keeps doing outrageous things, there is a big difference. In 2.5 years in English football he has amassed half a season worth of bans and has been dragged in front of the FA 3 times (for making offensive gestures at Fulham fans, the Evra incident and now biting Ivanovic). None of those things have been the result of refs being unduly harsh on him, they are the result of him acting like a ****. He is also very lucky not to have been sent off several times for shocking challenges, like the one on Parker, and not to have picked up several more booking for simulation (especially when you consider Bale has been booked 5 times for this offence when 4 of them were clear fouls against him).

"He simply is a marked man."

Wrong phrase, more Luis has previous. He needs to join up with our old friend Mr Barton in France.
 

SteveH

BSoDL candidate for SW London
Jul 21, 2003
8,642
9,313




he's partly responsible

he's partly responsible

he's partly responsible

he's partly responsible

he's partly responsible.




:banghead:
Unbelievable!

Mind, Liverpool fans reckon Sir Alex Ferguson is behind the whole thing. They are a very sad bunch over all things Suarez. The have muddle loyalty with blind stupidity.
 

dirtyh

One Skin, two skin.....
Jun 24, 2011
8,706
25,316
reina is a dong, just brainwashed like the rest of them with their victim mentality. hope the buck toothed cheating scumbag appeals and they make it a 42 game ban.
 

sunnydelight786

Chief Rocka
Jan 7, 2007
6,075
4,243
Brendan Rodgers: "We were very shocked and bitterly disappointed, not at the ban, at the severity of it."

Rodgers: "No correlation with McManaman tackle, only with similar incidents." Refers to Defoe being picked by FA for England after biting.

Rodgers: "I can't help but look at it & feel that the punishment has been against the man rather than the incident."

Rodgers: "The player needs a bit of help. We will look after our employee with the objective that something like this never happens again."

Rodgers says he doesn't feel let down by LS: "If we had half a dozen more players like him this football club would be in a diff position."

Rodgers: "I look in his face and I see a genuine guy who is bitterly disappointed. It'll take a bit of time for him to reflect."

Rodgers: "He's still very much part of the Liverpool family and very much part of the future."

Rodgers: "We never considered imposing our own ban."

Rodgers: "First time I've ever known an independent committee dictated to by so many people."

Rodgers says he couldn't disagree with "some of the words" spoken by Pepe Reina.

Rodgers: "I asked Luis what he was thinking and he couldn't answer."

Rodgers: "Even the Prime Minister chipped in with something which is a different matter all together."

Rodgers: "There's that little wire in his brain that sometimes acts differently. That's what we're trying to help."

Rodgers: "At this moment in time he'll feel really low because of the sanction."

Rodgers says no one could've complained if it'd been a six game ban with a further six suspended.

Rodgers: "There's been no thought for rehabilitation, only punishment."
 

Spurs_Bear

Well-Known Member
Jan 7, 2009
17,094
22,286
The fact that when he returns from this suspension he will have served a total of 17 matches just for BITING another human being proves the despicable little **** is not wired up properly. Proper fucking scumbag.
 

Gb160

Well done boys. Good process
Jun 20, 2012
23,685
93,478
Rodgers: "I asked Luis what he was thinking and he couldn't answer."

He was too busy chasing his tail,licking his balls ,and being distracted by next doors cat.
Rodgers really is a bell end , a post I read on here yesterday sums it up perfectly...
LFC: Offended by everything...ashamed of nothing.
 

dirtyh

One Skin, two skin.....
Jun 24, 2011
8,706
25,316
hahahaha, the 'liverpool family'? Is that where you get to shag your mum and your sister and produce 2 headed moronic offspring? god they make my skin crawl.
 

mpickard2087

Patient Zero
Jun 13, 2008
21,900
32,610
Rodgers has always been King Soundbite but he surpasses himself with all that. Of course they punish based on who the individual is, not just the offence. If a **** keeps doing stupid, ban-worthy things and not learning from them then the length of ban is going to go up and up every time until he finally learns not to be so much of a ****. Not exactly rocket science Brent-on.
 

SteveH

BSoDL candidate for SW London
Jul 21, 2003
8,642
9,313
Brendan Rodgers: "We were very shocked and bitterly disappointed, not at the ban, at the severity of it."

Rodgers: "No correlation with McManaman tackle, only with similar incidents." Refers to Defoe being picked by FA for England after biting.

Rodgers: "I can't help but look at it & feel that the punishment has been against the man rather than the incident."

Rodgers: "The player needs a bit of help. We will look after our employee with the objective that something like this never happens again."

Rodgers says he doesn't feel let down by LS: "If we had half a dozen more players like him this football club would be in a diff position."

Rodgers: "I look in his face and I see a genuine guy who is bitterly disappointed. It'll take a bit of time for him to reflect."

Rodgers: "He's still very much part of the Liverpool family and very much part of the future."

Rodgers: "We never considered imposing our own ban."

Rodgers: "First time I've ever known an independent committee dictated to by so many people."

Rodgers says he couldn't disagree with "some of the words" spoken by Pepe Reina.

Rodgers: "I asked Luis what he was thinking and he couldn't answer."

Rodgers: "Even the Prime Minister chipped in with something which is a different matter all together."

Rodgers: "There's that little wire in his brain that sometimes acts differently. That's what we're trying to help."

Rodgers: "At this moment in time he'll feel really low because of the sanction."

Rodgers says no one could've complained if it'd been a six game ban with a further six suspended.

Rodgers: "There's been no thought for rehabilitation, only punishment."

You would think KK was back in charge.

The club have big problems. They just don't get it, they are like a drunk in a revolving door - going nowhere.
 

talkshowhost86

Mod-Moose
Staff
Oct 2, 2004
48,304
47,460
Brendan Rodgers: "We were very shocked and bitterly disappointed, not at the ban, at the severity of it."

Really Rodge? Were you really shocked at it?

Rodgers: "No correlation with McManaman tackle, only with similar incidents." Refers to Defoe being picked by FA for England after biting.

What does being picked for England have to do with the price of fish Rodge?

Rodgers: "I can't help but look at it & feel that the punishment has been against the man rather than the incident."

Even if that is the case Rodge, do you not think that maybe that's fair enough considering the man in question has such an impressive list of previous twattery?

Rodgers: "The player needs a bit of help. We will look after our employee with the objective that something like this never happens again."

Good luck with that Rodge. In two years he's been getting worse not better so don't think he's going to change now. Maybe if someone had sat him down after his first bout of being an arsehole...

Rodgers says he doesn't feel let down by LS: "If we had half a dozen more players like him this football club would be in a diff position."

If you had a dozen more players like him then you'd struggle to put a team out wouldn't you Rodge?

Rodgers: "I look in his face and I see a genuine guy who is bitterly disappointed. It'll take a bit of time for him to reflect."

Does he have a reflection? Isn't he like Dracula in that respect?

Rodgers: "He's still very much part of the Liverpool family and very much part of the future."

The Liverpool family? I'm not sure anyone really wants to be a part of that anymore Rodge. As familys go it's a bit like being in the Jacksons...previously successful but now a complete joke.

Rodgers: "We never considered imposing our own ban."

Do you know what Rodge? This does not surprise me.

Rodgers: "First time I've ever known an independent committee dictated to by so many people."

What about the independent committee that looked at Suarez' racial slur against Evra? That was dictated to by half of Merseyside.

Rodgers says he couldn't disagree with "some of the words" spoken by Pepe Reina.

I dunno Rodge. I reckon you could if you really really tried.

Rodgers: "I asked Luis what he was thinking and he couldn't answer."

That's because he had a mouthful of arm at the time to be fair Rodge

Rodgers: "Even the Prime Minister chipped in with something which is a different matter all together."

It's actually still the same matter Rodge. You know...the matter of your player biting someone.

Rodgers: "There's that little wire in his brain that sometimes acts differently. That's what we're trying to help."

I think you may need some biology lessons Rodge. And you could also get rid of the word 'sometimes'.

Rodgers: "At this moment in time he'll feel really low because of the sanction."

Not because he bit someone on live television then Rodge? Just because he got punished for it?

Rodgers says no one could've complained if it'd been a six game ban with a further six suspended.

Yes because a suspended sentence is a good idea for someone who has ALREADY BEEN BANNED FOR THIS BEFORE!!!

Rodgers: "There's been no thought for rehabilitation, only punishment."

Rehabilitation? For fucks sake Rodge he's been banned from playing football whilst still collecting over 100k a week...he's not in Wormwood Scrubs!



Rodgers really is becoming a Grade-A cock-knocker. He needs to leave that club immediately.
 

$hoguN

Well-Known Member
Jul 25, 2005
26,678
34,823
Rodgers: "There's been no thought for rehabilitation, only punishment."

Rehabilitation? For fucks sake Rodge he's been banned from playing football whilst still collecting over 100k a week...he's not in Wormwood Scrubs!

Rodgers really is becoming a Grade-A cock-knocker. He needs to leave that club immediately.

Actually this is one time when I agree with Rodgers just a little bit. Suarez should have actually been given a longer ban, with the option of it being reduced pending him completing an anger management course, for example, 14 games with the chance to reduce this to 10 games pending his attendance of whatever sort of therapy they want him to go through. That way the FA would have been able to say that they were acting not only in the interest of punishing him for a idiotic action but were also giving him a chance at rehabilitation, which would have looked like a more progressive punishment. The end result would have been the same but they would have side-stepped a lot of criticism, and kept a looming extra 4 match ban hanging over his head for when he next acted like a petulant child.
 

absolute bobbins

Am Yisrael Chai
Feb 12, 2013
11,657
25,971
Brendan Rodgers: "We were very shocked and bitterly disappointed, not at the ban, at the severity of it."

Rodgers: "No correlation with McManaman tackle, only with similar incidents." Refers to Defoe being picked by FA for England after biting.

Rodgers: "I can't help but look at it & feel that the punishment has been against the man rather than the incident."

Rodgers: "The player needs a bit of help. We will look after our employee with the objective that something like this never happens again."

Rodgers says he doesn't feel let down by LS: "If we had half a dozen more players like him this football club would be in a diff position."

Rodgers: "I look in his face and I see a genuine guy who is bitterly disappointed. It'll take a bit of time for him to reflect."

Rodgers: "He's still very much part of the Liverpool family and very much part of the future."

Rodgers: "We never considered imposing our own ban."

Rodgers: "First time I've ever known an independent committee dictated to by so many people."

Rodgers says he couldn't disagree with "some of the words" spoken by Pepe Reina.

Rodgers: "I asked Luis what he was thinking and he couldn't answer."

Rodgers: "Even the Prime Minister chipped in with something which is a different matter all together."

Rodgers: "There's that little wire in his brain that sometimes acts differently. That's what we're trying to help."

Rodgers: "At this moment in time he'll feel really low because of the sanction."

Rodgers says no one could've complained if it'd been a six game ban with a further six suspended.

Rodgers: "There's been no thought for rehabilitation, only punishment."

What an utter dildo that man is
 

SteveH

BSoDL candidate for SW London
Jul 21, 2003
8,642
9,313
He must of been told to say this, surely?
Then who told him I ask myself.

Even Harry would have made a much better job of this. Let be honest my grandchildren could have done a better PR job.

It is bizarre!
 

$hoguN

Well-Known Member
Jul 25, 2005
26,678
34,823
A quick question for the solicitors among us, isn't Pepe Reina suggesting that Suarez' ban was the result of his nationality, tantamount to slander? As he is suggesting that the FA are racist.
 

bannedsc

Member
May 19, 2012
47
94
All this Liverpool defense of Suarez is not really helping him imho.

How is making him out to be the victim ever going to help him overcome his problems? if anything they are making them worse.

I can understand them thinking 10 games is too harsh and expressing that, but this should be within a message that what Suarez did was not acceptable and they are working with him to ensure this never happens again.
 
Top