- Feb 1, 2005
- 55,652
- 205,611
- Admin
- #23,421
Just realised that you also need to factor in the extra overs they'd have been batting for. As we're seeing, there's no bowling them out cheaply, they'd probably be around 60-80 runs ahead, maybe for the loss of one or two more wickets. I think this boils down to the chance that we'd bowl them out, either way, we'd be needing weather, but I take on board the point made by @dvdhopeful
I just don't see it as a thing
I just don't see it as a thing