- Aug 14, 2013
- 144
- 409
Rooney was a liability. Shagging prostitutes, chewing gum on tv etc...
That's giving brass'es a bad name, Rooney was & possibly still is, bashing the front doors off of grannies.
Rooney was a liability. Shagging prostitutes, chewing gum on tv etc...
Ultimately though he gets goals, can play as a wide man, can play on his own up the middle, already has successful experience of partnering our top scorer, and is likely to be available for a relatively reasonable sum.
Looking it at that way, it's hard to see many reasons why we wouldn't go for it, but there's something about it that doesn't quite feel right.
We've had a Sturridge already.To me we should go out and get him - especially if it is anything like the £15m reported in the press. The chances of us now going out and buying say a Sturridge for that price are now gone. Got to speculate a little and you would hope that the club have done their diligence on the guys character. Worth the gamble and we could have a player worth quite a bit in the future if he progresses as we'd hope. I like the idea. the guys also sharp and has pace. We lack sharpness and quick movement.
In addition - the 'so called character flaws' are kind of minor when you really look at them and analyse them. Stupidity and age really.
We did the same thing with the captains role last year, no thanksWe just need to ask Kane, Pritchard, Dier and Carroll what they make of Berahino, if they like him, we should go for it.
Berahino is an interesting one.
I thought he was going to be a bit of a flash in the pan, and it would still be a gamble based on one relatively good season.
There's also the questions over his attitude, though to be fair if he'd been a complete arse then Pulis would have hung him out to dry and that hasn't happened.
Ultimately though he gets goals, can play as a wide man, can play on his own up the middle, already has successful experience of partnering our top scorer, and is likely to be available for a relatively reasonable sum.
Looking it at that way, it's hard to see many reasons why we wouldn't go for it, but there's something about it that doesn't quite feel right.
So that's 1 defender & 4 Central Midfielders out of Spurs squad in a month. 2 potential first XI defenders in.
For first time, I get the feeling club is doing the transfer business based on a well defined plan.
Was stambouli a Poch signing?
Got Mid East move all over it for 2016/17I'm not so sure that's totally accurate as you can't really compare contract work to regular full-time work. Plenty here who have done contract work would probably tell you that they'll often be willing to take a pay cut to gain a longer more secure contract. Ade only has the one year left with us, if many of us were on a contract job with an unknown future we'd probably take the slight cut for something like and additional 3 or 4 years of security.
Was stambouli a Poch signing?
To me we should go out and get him - especially if it is anything like the £15m reported in the press. The chances of us now going out and buying say a Sturridge for that price are now gone. Got to speculate a little and you would hope that the club have done their diligence on the guys character. Worth the gamble and we could have a player worth quite a bit in the future if he progresses as we'd hope. I like the idea. the guys also sharp and has pace. We lack sharpness and quick movement.
In addition - the 'so called character flaws' are kind of minor when you really look at them and analyse them. Stupidity and age really.
That well defined plan is pretty simple really.
Ask the manager what he wants and not some director of football.
Sending Ade on loan is good news for us. He bloody loves scoring against his old clubs and if he's on loan he won't be allowed to play us.
Advantage Hotspur.
Berahino is an interesting one.
I thought he was going to be a bit of a flash in the pan, and it would still be a gamble based on one relatively good season.
There's also the questions over his attitude, though to be fair if he'd been a complete arse then Pulis would have hung him out to dry and that hasn't happened.
Ultimately though he gets goals, can play as a wide man, can play on his own up the middle, already has successful experience of partnering our top scorer, and is likely to be available for a relatively reasonable sum.
Looking it at that way, it's hard to see many reasons why we wouldn't go for it, but there's something about it that doesn't quite feel right.
Was stambouli a Poch signing?
So Stambouli has just won the French title before kicking a ball.