- Jun 8, 2018
- 3,985
- 18,073
Forgot the 'back out again' part?Just when I thought I was out; they pull me back in!
Forgot the 'back out again' part?Just when I thought I was out; they pull me back in!
I bet our offer was a loan with an obligation…If it is true it shows we have at least 45M to improve our first XI this window.
If it is true it shows we have at least 45M to improve our first XI this window.
No it's a cash offer with 10m in add-on'sI bet our offer was a loan with an obligation…
Those are the payables that are due this month. God knows how much next month or the month after etc. Their only way to get money in before June is to sell someone now. Plus whoever they sell they'll want money to replace them after their debts are paid.Their overdue payables is a whopping 5mn mate. I would be livid if we needed to pay 5mn and sold Harry Kane to fund it.
Interesting.Those are the payables that are due this month. God knows how much next month or the month after etc. Their only way to get money in before June is to sell someone now. Plus whoever they sell they'll want money to replace them after their debts are paid.
Thanks mate.
Had COVID. Daughter (now 13 months old) got it. In hospital with daughter. House purchase fell through at last minute. Sold our house anyway. Wife then in hospital with suspected sepsis but just horrific kidney infection. Had to take a week off my unbelievably time consuming job. That's my September for you since you asked.
But sure, was much more important to post on an internet forum about Spurs being shit in a transfer window.
Cheers.
"Look you better accept our offer quick we've bid for Diaz"I do wonder if this actually is a bit of a smokescreen. We're in negotiations with another player (Dybala for instance) and we're waiting on another party to agree to our terms. So we make it known that we bid for an alternative, in order to put pressure on them.
I'd love to know who the other party is. As someone wrote above, someone from Juve would make sense, given they've found money from somewhere. And would have to be a really big player if we'd be willing to fund Juve in getting Conte's main target.
Ok - who had smokescreen in the SC ITK Thread Bingo?I do wonder if this actually is a bit of a smokescreen. We're in negotiations with another player (Dybala for instance) and we're waiting on another party to agree to our terms. So we make it known that we bid for an alternative, in order to put pressure on them.
I'd love to know who the other party is. As someone wrote above, someone from Juve would make sense, given they've found money from somewhere. And would have to be a really big player if we'd be willing to fund Juve in getting Conte's main target.
Not me cos it's bullshit!Ok - who had smokescreen in the SC ITK Thread Bingo?
Those are the payables that are due this month. God knows how much next month or the month after etc. Their only way to get money in before June is to sell someone now. Plus whoever they sell they'll want money to replace them after their debts are paid.
Sure we seem to have £50m bids every window that never materialised and the moneys never seen againIf it is true it shows we have at least 45M to improve our first XI this window.
Fab on it now too. Likely had confirmation from Paratici that we are negotiating.
I'm pretty sure that's on the Bingo too!Not me cos it's bullshit!