What's new

The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - 26th August 2021

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jody

SC Supporter
Sep 11, 2004
7,008
5,826
The point I keep making is that, that would be ok if Son wasnt a regular. But because he plays every game that isnt "back-up". The back up to Kane is Scarlett. And I dont think a 17 year lad learning his trade is the correct back up for what we want to achieve.

Again, if Kane gets injured we burn out Sonny.
Yep, agree. Not sure why the club can’t work that one out?
 

danny32

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2004
650
3,273
They may disagree all they like but they have nothing to do with Spurs, where Aurier has been a true professional. This is where he is judged
Like when he left the stadium at half time v Liverpool after being subbed and criticised by Mourinnho earlier this year.
 

Majick

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2017
603
2,148
So, I wonder what the turning point was re going from definitely getting at least 1 more striker, irrespective of Kane staying or not, to none. Nuno’s tactics of playing just one up front don’t negate the need for cover. Confidence in Scarlett & Son in that position?

Fiorentina and Inter jacking up their prices for Vahovic and Martinez, at a guess - 90 million for both (surely we were never getting both but whatever) going to 90 million each so we’re not getting either.
 

Scouseyid

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2020
283
1,228
They have loads of goalscoring attackers/wingers though. Ziyech, Pulisic, Werner, Havertz, Mount as well as Lukaku. I think that is really strong and healthy.
So do we!

Son, Lucas, Bergwijn & Lo Celso had 22 league goals between them last season.

Ziyech, Pulisic, Werner, Havertz had 16. Add Mount, that's 22.

We have the 'goalscoring' backup for Kane. Let's now twist facts (or opinion) to suit our own agendas...
 

jimmyh

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2006
527
1,150
I think Herc said expecting at least 3 more in could that mean there might be more than 3 given there seems to be some opportunities as was alluded to by Herc.
 

lukadownthelane

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2008
2,813
5,608
So do we!

Son, Lucas, Bergwijn & Lo Celso had 22 league goals between them last season.

Ziyech, Pulisic, Werner, Havertz had 16. Add Mount, that's 22.

We have the 'goalscoring' backup for Kane. Let's now twist facts (or opinion) to suit our own agendas...
Surely that was almost all Son though who would become the striker if Kane was out?

I don’t think there’s any doubt we need another striker in the squad. If that’s someone who can play two positions then great, but we need another CF option.
 

DiVaio

Well-Known Member
May 27, 2020
4,178
17,421
They have loads of goalscoring attackers/wingers though. Ziyech, Pulisic, Werner, Havertz, Mount as well as Lukaku. I think that is really strong and healthy.
Lucas who was bad last season were scoring in very similar rate per 90 like the guys from Chelsea.

And if you are including the players that were scoring a lot in previous clubs but not yet at current club so we do have with Bergwijn, Lo Celso and Bryan. Also we shouldn't forget about Dele
 

Lo Amo Speroni

Only been in match thread once.
Aug 9, 2010
1,995
5,662
Okay here’s another way to think about it. The main targets we wanted are priced out, so the only other strikers out there would be expensive and not move the needle enough to be worth the outlay.

But, for a similar price you can get a winger who could move the needle. One so impactful you could even rest Son occasionally. Do you do that deal or sit on your hands waiting for a striker that will never come? Seems obvious to me...
This
 

Aphex

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2021
6,287
33,052
So do we!

Son, Lucas, Bergwijn & Lo Celso had 22 league goals between them last season.

Ziyech, Pulisic, Werner, Havertz had 16. Add Mount, that's 22.

We have the 'goalscoring' backup for Kane. Let's now twist facts (or opinion) to suit our own agendas...


You've just basically included Son's goals and named three other players. The issue is the over reliance on Son and Kane, what you've said doesn't alleviate that. Lucas, Berg and GLC's goal scoring is pitiful.
 

Scouseyid

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2020
283
1,228
You've just basically included Son's goals and named three other players. The issue is the over reliance on Son and Kane, what you've said doesn't alleviate that. Lucas, Berg and GLC's goal scoring is pitiful.
It doesn't matter though! We have the goals in Kanes absence! We always have, Son, Lucas & Dele always proved that. Bergwijn & Lo Celso will also help that now we have them!

Choosing to ignore the contributions from Son over the years is just poor. He's a great goalscorer. He's our predominant Kane back up & has been since 2018.

Comparing our attackers to other clubs' (Chelsea, City, Liverpool etc) is pathetic tbh & will always be undermined by the stats.

Over-reliance? Ha, they all do it! It's literally what goalscorers are paid to do!
 

Woodham Wanderer

Active Member
Jan 31, 2013
115
194
And when he gets injured for two months at some point? We run Son into the ground again? All the good teams have more than two proven goal scorers, we can't be going down that route and relying on them to score 90% of the 60+ goals that are needed for top four.
No point worrying about it we deal with it every year. We could have 2 mediocre strikers compared to one elite - not sure the mediocre really deliver anyway. Ideally 1 game a week majority of season should keep them relatively fresh - can’t legislate for injuries
 

Bulletspur

The Reasonable Advocate
Match Thread Admin
Oct 17, 2006
10,701
25,259
This flipping gripping about strikers is getting so tedious now. You said it once, so let it go and enjoy the ride. Your gripping will have no influence on who we get or dont get
 

Aphex

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2021
6,287
33,052
It doesn't matter though! We have the goals in Kanes absence! We always have, Son, Lucas & Dele always proved that. Bergwijn & Lo Celso will also help that now we have them!

Choosing to ignore the contributions from Son over the years is just poor. He's a great goalscorer. He's our predominant Kane back up & has been since 2018.

Comparing our attackers to other clubs' (Chelsea, City, Liverpool etc) is pathetic tbh & will always be undermined by the stats.

Over-reliance? Ha, they all do it! It's literally what goalscorers are paid to do!


We don't have the goals in Kane's absence. Lucas scores one goal in every 10 games in the PL. Son scores but the precise problem is after Son and Kane we have no other reliable goal scorers. The idea that people start naming Son as a back up to Kane, rather than a first team player in his own right is ridiculous. Son is not a back up to Kane, he is a fully fledged first 11 player who plays alongside Kane. If Kane is injured, there should be another player filling in, not moving Son out of position.

The idea of comparing our attackers to other clubs is pathetic, well erm, that is who we are competing against.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top