The Daily ITK Discussion Thread 7th June 2016

Status
Not open for further replies.

smudger

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2006
Messages
1,616
#31
After seeing what everyone else is gonna be doing. I really think we need to make this window count with the lure of champions league for what it's worth. Last time we got vdv but even then we didn't make the most of it. But if we only get Jansen then I'd trust poch a hell of a lot more than old arry when it comes to transfers that's the right move
 
Last edited:

Joshua

Active Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2015
Messages
620
#32
really hope this isn't the only move we made for a striker, really don't think he is good enough to transform us. believe we will still get a Michy though
Do we need transforming? What we need is refining. A young hungry striker like Janssen would sharpen us up in the striking department no end. Feel like the first time in ages we don't need overhaul in a transfer window. young dynamic players like this is the way forward imo. Just keep us fresh.
 
Joined
Jul 10, 2015
Messages
600
#33
Do we need transforming? What we need is refining. A young hungry striker like Janssen would sharpen us up in the striking department no end. Feel like the first time in ages we don't need overhaul in a transfer window. young dynamic players like this is the way forward imo. Just keep us fresh.
sharpen us up to an extent, not to what we need
 

SpartanSpur

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2011
Messages
4,733
#35
Janssen at the prices mooted has Levy written all over it. Looks a perfect understudy to Kane. Have to say I'd much rather Batshuayi however has he offers something a bit different. Signing Batshuayi and Janssen doesn't make as much sense either as neither is really a WF option unlike Lacazette or Embolo.
 

yankspurs

“We’re not a selling club”
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
24,295
#37
Janssen at the prices mooted has Levy written all over it. Looks a perfect understudy to Kane. Have to say I'd much rather Batshuayi however has he offers something a bit different. Signing Batshuayi and Janssen doesn't make as much sense either as neither is really a WF option unlike Lacazette or Embolo.
Do we need another player who can play up top and in the AM? We already have Son and N'Jie. We need at least 1 striker.

Janssen is an option by the sounds of the itk. Doesnt mean he's our top choice right now.
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2005
Messages
14,241
#38
sharpen us up to an extent, not to what we need
We've got one of the best strikers in Europe playing centre forward for us. It's very hard to get someone in to play second fiddle to him. From what I've seen and read he sounds ideal as an alternative to Kane.

Also, to get him in for pre season as he's not at the euros is another plus.
 

SpartanSpur

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2011
Messages
4,733
#39
Do we need another player who can play up top and in the AM? We already have Son and N'Jie. We need at least 1 striker.

Janssen is an option by the sounds of the itk. Doesnt mean he's our top choice right now.
Fee agreed and player in London suggests it's pretty advanced.

Bats > Janssen for me. I'd be happy with us getting two strikers so we are stacked there but we'd ideally need them to be more versatile.

I'm just not convinced by N'Jie, and I'm not sure the club is either.
 

bubble07

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2004
Messages
13,731
#40
Maybe they thought to get a relatively cheap back up and spend the 30m on a wide forward/striker like Lacazette...

Janssen and Lacazette is better then just Batman
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top