The Daily ITK Discussion Thread 9 June 2011

[smudger]

please stop bashing ITK'S
:bang:

everyday there is always like 4 pages of stuff saying "so adie wheres the pre contract?" etc etc it gets boring i trundle through pages and pages on this thread on my phone and its the same thing everyday abusing adie and dan ashcroft, so they got things wrong and god knows what dans done, but big deal,did you enjoy reading it and getting excited?...yes, it's not a matter of life and death it helps us get through so just enjoy it people.

at the end of the day we're all spurs fans and enjoy itk whether good,bad or indifferent.

 

[TwoSaintsComeMarching]

please stop bashing ITK'S
:bang:

everyday there is always like 4 pages of stuff saying "so adie wheres the pre contract?" etc etc it gets boring i trundle through pages and pages on this thread on my phone and its the same thing everyday abusing adie and dan ashcroft, so they got things wrong and god knows what dans done, but big deal,did you enjoy reading it and getting excited?...yes, it's not a matter of life and death it helps us get through so just enjoy it people.

at the end of the day we're all spurs fans and enjoy itk whether good,bad or indifferent.

Adie isnt an ITK though.

 

[DoublePivot]

What makes you think Dan is itk?

in fact, while I may not agree with Dan on things, I do respect him greatly for one thing.

When Poyet left and he lost his contact, he didn't try and hold onto his ITK status like a few of the others.

 

[Clamour_Kid]

Adie isnt an ITK though.

Eh? So what are the rules for posting info on the ITK read only board?

 

[MilkyBarYid]

Sorry but what makes what you're TOLD any more valid than my mate down the pubs girlfriend's, auntie's, ex-boyfriend who knows a bloke who walks Wayne Rooney's poodle?

I thought the whole point of ITK is that it is meant to more than just what amounts to pub talk? If info that an ITK is TOLD is continually inaccurate then I think it's only fair that it's validity be questioned as part of the discussion.

Yeah but some ITK will have a credible source that will TELL them information, could be anything from a director to the groundsman, that doesn't mean it is a mate down the pubs girlfriend's, auntie's, ex-boyfriend who knows a bloke who walks Wayne Rooney's poodle does it?

 

[Rob]

I thought we all sorted this out yesterday. Can people lay off Adie please and stop all the ITK bashing.

 

[TwoSaintsComeMarching]

Eh? So what are the rules for posting info on the ITK read only board?

His source is clearly a WUM, ergo he isnt any more "In the know" as you and I.

Also, there's no rule that says we cant bash an ITK's source.

Adiepf's source is a WUM.

End of. Lets move on.

 

[talkshowhost86]

Right please can everyone put their prongs back in their prong containers.

We all know the rules on ITK and if they are broken, by either the ITKs or the readers of the ITK then us moderators will deal with it. If you feel you are being abused/subject to some obviously oderous info then please report it rather than waving your wangers in here.

Much obliged.

I thought we all sorted this out yesterday. Can people lay off Adie please and stop all the ITK bashing.

Exactly.

Granted I put it alot more eloquently but the boss is still right.

 

[StartingPrice]

I
AM
not
ITK
:dance::dance::dance:

​

Wee wile bye sum plyers hoo r gud (purple and chocolate, Jive Bunnies).​

 

[Clamour_Kid]

His source is clearly a WUM, ergo he isnt any more "In the know" as you and I.

Also, there's no rule that says we cant bash an ITK's source.

Adiepf's source is a WUM.

End of. Lets move on.

Right ok. Cheers.

 

[sidford]

wheres ryan with some proper itk?

think we need this update before mods start banning people

 

[AFred]

:grin:

His source is clearly a WUM, ergo he isnt any more "In the know" as you and I.

Also, there's no rule that says we cant bash an ITK's source.

Adiepf's source is a WUM.

End of. Lets move on.

Personally, I wouldnt go as far as calling Adiepf's source a WUM.

However one thing that is very clear to me, you and everyone else on the board including the mods is that Adiepfs source is clearly not passing info in good faith.

Golden rule of any ITK is to pass info in good faith.:grin:

 

[talkshowhost86]

wheres ryan with some proper itk?

think we need this update before mods start banning people

I forgot about that. I'd say it may be a 'have a pint and wait for tomorrow' sort of situation.

 

[nailsy]

Didn't Ryan update us earlier? It's not in RO, but wasn't there something else earlier?

 

[Rob]

Lets move on.

You certainly will be. Bye.

 

[Berglad]

Ryan already gave his update I thought:

Just to add to what I wrote earlier

Drogba and falcao are both realistic targets, but both come with stumbling blocks. Drogba would need to instigate the move as far as Chelsea are concerned and even then, the feeling is that they would refuse a move to another English club. He would also want an awful lot of money. Were working on it

Falcao is a bit more intresting. By all accounts in comes down to brinkmanship. They want around 27m euros. We want him. Arsenal want him. Teams from Spain and Italy do also. However we see the goons as the main rivals. I think we are trying to avoid a heads up. They also want benzema. If they get him the coast would seem clear for falcao. We would then be able to drive a harder bargain. I don't think we are being tight, were just looking at which option is gonna work out most viable

Leandro will sign. However we have asked to be kept abreast of the wickham situation.

 

[nailsy]

Here it is...

Just to add to what I wrote earlier

Drogba and falcao are both realistic targets, but both come with stumbling blocks. Drogba would need to instigate the move as far as Chelsea are concerned and even then, the feeling is that they would refuse a move to another English club. He would also want an awful lot of money. Were working on it

Falcao is a bit more intresting. By all accounts in comes down to brinkmanship. They want around 27m euros. We want him. Arsenal want him. Teams from Spain and Italy do also. However we see the goons as the main rivals. I think we are trying to avoid a heads up. They also want benzema. If they get him the coast would seem clear for falcao. We would then be able to drive a harder bargain. I don't think we are being tight, were just looking at which option is gonna work out most viable

Leandro will sign. However we have asked to be kept abreast of the wickham situation.

Beaten to it again :bang:

 

[DoublePivot]

You certainly will be. Bye.

:rofl:

He was truly asking for that.

 

[talkshowhost86]

Don't mess with Rob. He's got game. Dangerous game.

 

[TwoSaintsComeMarching]

Harsh.