I’m done trying to explain this to you but for everyone else’s benefit, moving to a new stadium does not have to go hand in hand with a total absence of on field sporting ambition, that was a pro-active choice by our owners who are more focussed on getting a return by selling the club than by developing it on the pitch, as far as they are concerned the stadium is the end game not the beginning of anything. I like reading the ITK on transfers, taken with appropriate salt, but I am ITK when it comes to the stadium and the sale of the club so I’m not speculating I’m telling you know what I know to be true.
Here's a look at one of his runs down the flank today that was ended by an Ottamendi WWE takedown (and no foul called
). Truly Bale-esque. 
Agreed but would add that the poor investment largely arose as a result of trying to get things done on the cheap, an expensive mistake in the long run.
They made the choice not to redevelop the entire ground as the previous owners had proposed going for the cheaper option of redeveloping the existing stadium to give them a bigger capacity at a far lower capital outlay. No doubt this facilitated their greater investment in players. This isn’t random they took a similar path with their baseball franchise in Boston.
Banter.
