- Jan 18, 2011
- 8,109
- 9,698
What I would say about Fergie is that he's similar to Harry, in that he has an eye for players and a great motivator. However I feel they both lack tactically. SAF has learn't over the years, as Harry would have had he been managing at the top level for 20 odd years. Historically, SAF's number 2, has always been a tactician. An analyzer. McLaren, Phelan, Quieroz and so on. They point out the tactics and he utilises them.
I'm sure Harry does the same to an extent with his backroom staff, however I don't think they work on things enough. Many times we hear players in interviews saying the enjoy their football as they are told to just "go out and play". VdV has said how training is very simple. Abit ominous.
However I don't agree for one moment that we should even be thinking about Harry's position. How the fuck can we? We need stability. The only way I'd replace Harry is if I was sure he'd leave for England in a few months, and Mourinho suddenly became available. Then I'd sack him before he quits, and get him in. Should he pledge loyatly to Spurs however, the same must be practised by us fans/the Club.
I don't agree with your assessment, I think Ferguson is very tactically astute or has at least become that way over the years, our 'Arry instead seems to not even believe tactics/strategy is important so why would he have analytical strategist types on his staff? Also when you watch other teams you see teamwork that must have been practiced in training but I don't really see that as much with us.
Still agree that Harry should stay with us unless he decides to leave but I just wish he would admit his mistakes or at least learn from them instead of blabbing on about "2 points in 8 games, quarterfinals of the CL, etc."