- Feb 23, 2004
- 2,556
- 82
Just had a look at the match ratings thread, and ill be extremely suprised if anyone who was at the game would give Kaboul and Gudjohnson the same rating.
Whilst the first obviously has creative deficiencies, i was impressed with Younes' discipline and was pleased with him winning challenges and headers and then distributing it simply.
Gudjohnson on the other hand was quite frankly a joke. I wasnt pleased when we signed him, but his laziness was embarrasing and could have cost us, none more so than when he was doing his best Messi impression in our own penalty area after we had defended a corner. Him coming on for Defoe and playing in the 'number 10' position really hindered us and forced us onto the back foot, which could have been disasterous
For me, if Huddlestone is out, its a no-brainer that Kaboul should be there as opposed to Eidur-at least he will give it his all and not leave us exposed through the middle, which the Ice-man undoubtedly would do.
Whilst the first obviously has creative deficiencies, i was impressed with Younes' discipline and was pleased with him winning challenges and headers and then distributing it simply.
Gudjohnson on the other hand was quite frankly a joke. I wasnt pleased when we signed him, but his laziness was embarrasing and could have cost us, none more so than when he was doing his best Messi impression in our own penalty area after we had defended a corner. Him coming on for Defoe and playing in the 'number 10' position really hindered us and forced us onto the back foot, which could have been disasterous
For me, if Huddlestone is out, its a no-brainer that Kaboul should be there as opposed to Eidur-at least he will give it his all and not leave us exposed through the middle, which the Ice-man undoubtedly would do.