Tottenham Vs West Ham: Match Thread
- Thread starter chrissivad
- Start date
nedley
John Duncan's Love Child
- Jul 28, 2006
- 13,992
- 28,176
No. Afraid not.
Lennon1981
Well-Known Member
- Jun 30, 2011
- 478
- 937
And this is why I don't do predictions and my betting form is shocking
HoltbiusMac
ScroobiusMac
- Jun 25, 2013
- 817
- 2,222
walworthyid
David Ginola
- Oct 25, 2004
- 7,059
- 10,242
We could do a lot worse than AAde and Soldado starting. We might actually score.
So are we thinking this means 442?
only1waddle
Well-Known Member
- Jun 18, 2012
- 8,238
- 12,519
The purists will love it, Chas n Dave in front of a midfield 4, it's a cockney knees up..
JUSTINSIGNAL
Well-Known Member
- Jul 10, 2008
- 16,032
- 48,764
4 4 fucking 2. I thought i'd seen the back of the damn formation 
THFCSPURS19
The Speaker of the Transfer Rumours Forum
- Jan 6, 2013
- 37,898
- 130,561
I don't get the negativity. When we used the formation against Liverpool at WHL in the Harry era we won 4-0 as opposed to being battered 0-54 4 fucking 2. I thought i'd seen the back of the damn formation
TheSecretNonFootballer
Well-Known Member
- Oct 31, 2013
- 1,147
- 1,433
The article says he could even start. Not set to start.
Unless I'm missing something...
RuskyM
Well-Known Member
- Jul 9, 2011
- 7,198
- 23,702
Christ 4-4-2 isn't the answer.
4-1-3-2 might be, 4-2-2-2 could be, 4-3-1-2 could be, if it's a flat 4-4-2 I'll stab a bitch.
Funny to think how eight months ago we wanted Ade out and now suddenly he's the messiah. Absence, heart, fonder yadda yadda
4-1-3-2 might be, 4-2-2-2 could be, 4-3-1-2 could be, if it's a flat 4-4-2 I'll stab a bitch.
Funny to think how eight months ago we wanted Ade out and now suddenly he's the messiah. Absence, heart, fonder yadda yadda
walworthyid
David Ginola
- Oct 25, 2004
- 7,059
- 10,242
Perhaps. It can be quite flexible if played with the right players. Ade isn't really an on the shoulder player like Soldado so he could sit behind and link play. Anything beats the way we have been set up for the last year.
thinktank
Hmmm...
- Sep 28, 2004
- 45,893
- 68,893
JUSTINSIGNAL
Well-Known Member
- Jul 10, 2008
- 16,032
- 48,764
We don't have the right players to make it work effectively. Plus I happen to think it's an outdated formation and it doesn't promote the kind of attacking fluid football I want to see.
walworthyid
David Ginola
- Oct 25, 2004
- 7,059
- 10,242
I didn't want him out at all. Once he was fit and playing he was very good in the last few games of the season. He is a top class striker and he has a role to play this season hopefully.
At his worst he is better than Defoe who is basically useless.
only1waddle
Well-Known Member
- Jun 18, 2012
- 8,238
- 12,519
Looks like a mirror article, and John Cross by the looks of it, i'l wait for the official tweet tomorrow night..
4 4 fucking 2. I thought i'd seen the back of the damn formation
Sherwood has preferred 4-3-3 and 4-2-3-1 on youth level, but it's not simply about numbers. Given right roles and right players you can play very good football with 4-4-2 too as seen not so long ago. And you can serve utter shite with 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1 as seen even more recently.
Couldn't give a flying fuck about formation, if there is return of some basic elements like off the ball movement when we're attacking and some tempo to the game he can field any nice number combination to the field he wants.
lillywhites61
SC Supporter
- Aug 11, 2009
- 3,538
- 2,270
For the first time in a while now I am looking forward to watching spurs without a fear of dread!
I think we will perform tomorrow and perform well, I can see a strong performance with pace. Hopefully no pissing around and we just get at em!
Taking both my nephews as well so will be a good game to start playing again
I think we will perform tomorrow and perform well, I can see a strong performance with pace. Hopefully no pissing around and we just get at em!
Taking both my nephews as well so will be a good game to start playing again
Similar threads
