- May 5, 2004
- 24,182
- 48,812
Given his narcissism and Marseille’s volatility, odds are he doesn’t last a year.Hadn't realised that AVB had been appointed as the Marseille coach. Will be interesting to see what he does there.
Given his narcissism and Marseille’s volatility, odds are he doesn’t last a year.Hadn't realised that AVB had been appointed as the Marseille coach. Will be interesting to see what he does there.
Oh no, here we go again. Biggest points tally blah blah blah.
Not going over this shit again. Boring.
Bloke was a prick.
Oh no, here we go again. Biggest points tally blah blah blah.
Not going over this shit again. Boring.
Bloke was a prick.
Eh????I quite liked him. Football was bad though.
Oh sorry sugar titsYep, here we go again - another unnecessary OTT post with an extreme opinion in order to get your point across, a prick? really?
Same as Redknapp haters.lol, AVB haters are so sensitive that they can't accept any semi positive things being spoken about him.
Eh????
Oh sorry sugar tits
It's difficult to know who was the blame for the following season. It's hard to know if AVB, Baldini, Levy or other scouts were responsible for acquiring some of the players. Even so, there were a couple of decent ones in Chadli, Eriksen etc.
I don't think the problem was the individuals as such but more the number of players and the fact they were all from foreign leagues. With a world class player leaving and also having to deal with a squad not gelled then looking back you can see why things were difficult.
On that first point I think if you look at our first season under Villas-Boas you can argue the opposite. This was clearly a hugely unbalanced squad, very patchy depth wise, smatterings of quality across the pitch with one uber footballer. In spite of this AVB cultivated a strong work ethic and team football. There are various quotes from players in the press from the time speaking about the tight knit atmosphere.I don't think it's difficult at all. The blame attaches to AVB, because, for all his good qualities as tactical and technical coach, he did not select players with a view to form to form a squad and he did not have the ability to weld a squad into a mutually-supportive team that was greater than the sum of its parts.
That is Pochettino's peculiar gift, along with other managers who have much greater cvs. than he has assembled: Ferguson, Shankly, Mourinho earlier in his career. Even Redknapp, in his own ramshackle way, made his squad members feel like a team, as van der Vaart and many others have testified.
AVB didn't even seem to see the necessity. He just signed and selected players and gave out instructions. The result, as always, was a squad full of feuds, cliques, passive-aggressive behaviour and under-performance.
It wasn't about the players. It was about the team.
lol, AVB haters are so sensitive that they can't accept any semi positive things being spoken about him.
Shouldn't have sacked Harry tbh, but there we are.
He may have done one or two good things but his football sucked the life out of most fans who actually consider football to be a form of entertainment.
He was the manager I was most glad we got rid of, souls destroying, I am really not sure how anyone could have wanted him to remain.
Harry flirted with England and took his eye of the ball with us.
He thought he was untouchable and got what he deserved in my opinion.
He showed a lack of respect to spurs