What our opponents' fans are saying about us 17/18

[Luka Van der Bale]

I said we should aiming to beat teams in the bottom 7 in both legs, I didnt say not drop points any points outside of the top 7 but carry on.

I also highlighted that we have dropped more points than our rivals with regards to that group whilst destroying the mid table sides

Chelsea are absolutely running away with the league. I don't know what you expect but you seem to be leaving Arsenal, Liverpool and United out of your list of our rivals. Let me guess - because we're better than them in this regard? It's nowhere near as bad as you're making out.

Us and Chelsea are the only sides with no defeats against teams outside the top 7.

 

[Shadydan]

Dressing up stats - like claiming a team in the top half of the table are 'relegation threatened' because it flips the argument in your favour.



Southampton have started scoring more frequently since signing Gabbiadini - eight in their last two games. Burnley have one of the best home records in the league (only us, Chelsea, Man Utd and Everton have conceded fewer goals at home than Burnley, only us, Chelsea and Liverpool have won more games at home).

Any Swansea stat taken for the whole season is going to be disproportionate as a result of the shambles they were under Bradley. They're clearly a much improved team than when we played them earlier, and had they appointed Clement instead of Bradley they'd probably be comfortably in the top half.

Not really sure where I got Southampton being just above Watford but I'll happily concede that point...Either way if I used the example of two teams above Burnley then would you agree that it shows a weakness against bottom teams (we won those games by the way)

Also unsure where you're going with your Burnley example talking about goals conceded when the argument is about those teams scoring goals and our defence being able to cope without Kane?

 

[Shadydan]

I said we should aiming to beat teams in the bottom 7 in both legs, I didnt say not drop points any points outside of the top 7 but carry on.

I also highlighted that we have dropped more points than our rivals with regards to that group whilst destroying the mid table sides

Our rivals being only Chelsea and Man City...

What about Arsenal, Liverpool and Man Utd?

 

[Ossie85]

What's all that got to do with this thread??

What are the soton fans saying?

 

[MarkyP]

What's all that got to do with this thread??

What are the soton fans saying?

no doubt something along the lines of how much bigger than us they are, and how everything is so unfair blah blah blah

 

[Sweech]

I said we should aiming to beat teams in the bottom 7 in both legs, I didnt say not drop points any points outside of the top 7 but carry on.

I also highlighted that we have dropped more points than our rivals with regards to that group whilst destroying the mid table sides

You highlighted City and Chelsea. Even you had to admit City's record was similar.

Then as others have noted you somehow conveniently left out Arsenal, Liverpools, and United. More than half of the rivals.

It's so obvious you've made a conclusion and want to morph the facts around it rather than looking at the facts and making a properly informed decision.

 

[nightgoat]

Not really sure where I got Southampton being just above Watford but I'll happily concede that point...Either way if I used the example of two teams above Burnley then would you agree that it shows a weakness against bottom teams (we won those games by the way)

Also unsure where you're going with your Burnley example talking about goals conceded when the argument is about those teams scoring goals and our defence being able to cope without Kane?

Where do you think citing a team's good defence when we might not have Kane might be going?

 

[Shadydan]

Where do you think citing a team's good defence when we might not have Kane might be going?

Away from the original argument?

 

[beats1]

Chelsea are absolutely running away with the league. I don't know what you expect but you seem to be leaving Arsenal, Liverpool and United out of your list of our rivals. Let me guess - because we're better than them in this regard? It's nowhere near as bad as you're making out.

Us and Chelsea are the only sides with no defeats against teams outside the top 7.

Our rivals being only Chelsea and Man City...

What about Arsenal, Liverpool and Man Utd?

You highlighted City and Chelsea. Even you had to admit City's record was similar.

Then as others have noted you somehow conveniently left out Arsenal, Liverpools, and United. More than half of the rivals.

It's so obvious you've made a conclusion and want to morph the facts around it rather than looking at the facts and making a properly informed decision.

I was told that we are at a different level to what were before

Also City's record is better albeit slightly, they dropped one less point but played more matches

not really sure we need to take 2014/15 as a sample seeing as we are playing on a completely different level now compared to then.

The teams you guys are mentioning are at the level we were before fighting for 4th

Might as well look anyway
Liverpool
Top 5 - 8 points from 9 games
Middle 7 - 7 points from 8 games
Bottom 7 - 14 points from 11 games

Arsenal
Top 5 - 15 points from 7 games
Middle 7 - 6 points from 9 games
Bottom 7 - 6 points from 10 games

Man Utd
Top 5 - 12 points from 6 games
Middle 7 - 13 points from 10 games
Bottom 7 - 4 points from 10 games

So yeah we have the second worse record in the top 6 against the bottom 7 teams, Liverpool by far are the worst and we match Arsenal's record if we win our next match against the bottom 7.

 

[millsey]

And guess what, Kane missed the Bournemouth, Leicester and West Brom game

Rogmeister seems to be spamming a lot today. Maybe Kane did play those games.....

 

[inclineyid]

Fuck this

 

[ziggy]

Anyway back on topic..............

From Saints web

"Kane has been on fire recently. The 6-0 might give them confidence but we're far, far better than Millwall, and no Kane for Spurs is a massive plus for us. We're back in form, I can see us springing a surprise next week."

"IF we can play as well as we did in the EFL we could win 4-3 without Kane harassing our rookie defence."

"If we come away with a close defeat that will be a very good result. Spurs, even without Kane, are one of the best three teams in the league. They have lost the least games along with Chelsea and I think Man U?"

"A defeat is never* a good result. Especially against ****ing Spurs."

 

[riggi]

http://www.millwall.vitalfootball.co.uk/forum/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=123237&posts=4

 

[Gb160]

http://www.millwall.vitalfootball.co.uk/forum/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=123237&posts=4

Overwhelming feeling these posts are being made from a mobile phone that has been smuggled into prison via someone's bum.

 

[Mr Pink]

Rogspamster

 

[riggi]

Overwhelming feeling these posts are being made from a mobile phone that has been smuggled into prison via someone's bum.

The forum is a mess.

 

[Gb160]

The forum is a mess.

They're really struggling with the whole 'yid' thing over there...bless them, they must share some DNA with West Ham.

 

[Danny1]

http://www.millwall.vitalfootball.co.uk/forum/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=123237&posts=4

Haha oh god! I read the OP with a Pwoper Milwall Type Voice Geeza! Seriously though what a plebeian! Your team got twatted 6 nil and that's the only thing you can think of, congratulations your club is rubbish!

Knuckle dragging, over sized forehead, useless excuse for skin and air!

 

[nedley]

Wow shocking stuff. Speechless

Yep.

Them kids should be taken away from their parents for their own sake.

They are creating a vile human to add to their vile family.

 

[absolute bobbins]

http://www.millwall.vitalfootball.co.uk/forum/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=123237&posts=4

Lolz

Milwall are like if Chelsea got West Ham pregnant