- Dec 22, 2003
- 8,067
- 7,540
Naturally, he's not got the players to out-football better sides. I feel it shows he is less naive than Rodgers.
I don't really follow your point here, Swansea and Norwich are in roughly the same position player wise and both being new to the league this year. Swansea play more of a cultured passing game, Norwich are hard working and industrious, where does naivety come into it? If Norwich had had a better season I could see what you mean but as it stands I'm afraid I can't.
My main concern with Lambert is how he goes when his side get some better players and he has to act rather than react. But his Championship title suggests he has no problem being a favourite.
This is my main concern with Lambert too, and so far he has shown nothing to suggest he would play better quality football with a better quality of player. Allardyce certainly hasn't changed his formula wherever he's been. I would agree that he appears capable of handling expectation.
His Champions League winners medal likewise.
This comes up a lot. I would share in admiration for his study of coaching methods in Germany but I don't understand what his playing achievements can possibly tell us about his ability as a manager. There are a great many players who have had more successful careers than Paul Lambert and have gone on to be terrible managers. Playing achievement doesn't come into it as far as I'm concerned, look at Mourinho and Wenger compared to say Guulit, Maradonna or Keane.