- Sep 4, 2014
- 52
- 114
I think Conte wants someone who can play in the Jorginho role more than someone who can play number 10, especially when Bissouma is not very good at long passing.
I’ve gotten to the point where if we decide to sign someone it means it is Conte/Paratici endorsed. I clearly back Conte/Paratici’s understanding of what our squad needs more than myself or any fan.
Taking that view it’s quite easy to get behind players linked to us. Tielemans is hardly an average player though, he’s shown a very high level in the PL before dropping off last season along with the whole Leicester team.
I'd say Bissouma was for starter quality depth. Don't forget, that even with Bissouma, we're still only 1 injury away from not being able to rotate our two in midfield. With all the games across 4 comps, we can definitely do with another First 11 quality player in YT -- especially as he gives Conte something different to change up the formation. For not a lot of cash, he buys us a big upgrade on numbers and options. No brainer for me.
Not if we want to seriously challenge in 4 completions + 5 sun rule then it isn’t.What about Skipp?
This is the problem, 5 into 2 is complete overkill.
Yea very true mate but across 4 competitions with a tight schedule and 5 sub rule 3 CM’s would be very light/risky and with only 4 we’d be one injury away from that scenario.Bentancur, Hojbjerg, Skipp and Bissouma
1 player unavailable still gives us an option from the bench and able to rotate players.
It might not be a 2 in 2 out rotation, but you can still manage game time.
I dunno. Are some maybe underwhelmed based on his latest season performances??
But...
Bit stat heavy, but I did like this...
Still, Tielemans’ midfield role at Leicester is hardly of the free-scoring Frank Lampard ilk. The best of his attacking output comes in creating openings for others. Since his Premier League debut, only Bruno Fernandes (127), Jack Grealish (166) and Kevin De Bruyne (190) have created more chances from open play than Tielemans (115). It’s a figure that’s helped Leicester to 171 league goals in his time at the club, a tally only bettered by Liverpool (210) and Manchester City (232).
Why Youri Tielemans Is One of the Premier League's Best Midfielders
Leicester City have turned their form around in recent games, but Youri Tielemans has kept his standards remarkably high in 2021-22.theanalyst.com
Sure, but it's still cutting it fine. One suspension or further injury and we're barebones again. Conte lamented numerous times about the lack of a bench. And then there's the chance we might play with 3 in the middle at times. We can't do that over a season with just 4 cms, none of which are suited to the more progressive role like YT.Bentancur, Hojbjerg, Skipp and Bissouma
1 player unavailable still gives us an option from the bench and able to rotate players.
It might not be a 2 in 2 out rotation, but you can still manage game time.
Yea very true mate but across 4 competitions with a tight schedule and 5 sub rule 3 CM’s would be very light/risky and with only 4 we’d be one injury away from that scenario.
If we have the money to sign one and we have covered all the other weak areas of the squad then this would be a cherry on the icing on the cake for me to have absolutely every base covered in terms of injuries and rotation and going deep in all 4 competitions.
He gives us the option of going into a 3 though without looking very negative. I think 3 of our current 4 options looks too defensive. Also, we are bound to get injuries, probably won’t be that often that all 5 are fit and available.
Personally I would prefer a B.Silva type that could cover/compete with Kulusevski from a creativity perspective in the XI, but also is such a tireless runner they can work in a midfield 3. Those players are rare though so we have Richarlison/Lucas as Kulu cover and Tielemans covers that midfield spot.
I think Tielemans as a player is being seriously underrated by some though. If we are chasing a goal he’s an excellent option to come on in midfield 2 vs what we currently have. He has creative passing and is capable of the spectacular - see FA cup winning screamer and that unreal chip into the top corner vs United.
He was one of the standout players in the Prem before last season over multiple years. Potentially Leicester’s best player as they won the FA cup and came within a whisker of top 4 twice. This is not an average player.
Not if we want to seriously challenge in 4 completions + 5 sun rule then it isn’t.
If we have only 4 and get 1 injury then we will have 2-3 guys playing an absolute ton of minutes.
Also with a Tilemans type signing it would give us the flexibility to play 3-5-2 when needed.
Conte had the quality of likes of Eriksen often on the bench at Inter and that was without 5 sub rule or such a competitive league as the PL.
5 CM’s here makes total sense for what Conte wants to achieve given the 5 sub rule
I’m not against a midfield option. I’m against having a player who is similar to other options. It makes more sense to sign a AM/no.10 type who can play as a 10 behind a front 2. That is what gives us ‘options’.
He isn’t alike any of the other 4 imo. He would be closest to Bentancur but is far more progressive with his passing and his ball carrying.
But that’s not what Conte did to Eriksen who was as 10y as they come. So no I don’t agree we need that trad 10.Yes he’s closest to Bentancour and essentially he wants to play as a 6 or 8. It’s better if we sign a player who is comfortable as an 8 or 10.
I was coming in to say this. Conte doesn’t play with those classic 10s, they’re more creative 8sBut that’s not what Conte did to Eriksen who was as 10y as they come. So no I don’t agree we need that trad 10.
It depends how much depth we have in the forward line. If it stays as is and we get a couple of injuries up there Conte can just switch it up to a 3-5-2.What about Skipp?
This is the problem, 5 into 2 is complete overkill.