What's new

Arsenal

jay2040

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
2,679
4,274
It would be a great PR stunt if we offer them jobs, even if it is scrubbing Kane's boots!
 

Finchyid

Well-Known Member
Jun 27, 2017
3,781
11,984
Who else in 'entertainment' gets paid more than footballers to the extent that their pay is peanuts in comparison?

ozil is getting paid nearly 500 times as much as one of those 55.. it’s shocking

this will happen at other clubs, on the other hand levy secured a virtually interest free loan to protect us
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,684
104,964
They seem to be letting their best scouts go in those redundancies. We should be trying to snap them up.
 

yankspurs

Enic Out
Aug 22, 2013
41,962
71,378
Nah you know what im not having? Arsenal fams having a grand old time somehow blaming Ozil’s wages. This is a fucking club thats set to give a 32 year old Willian like 200k/wk for 4 years. A club that wants to give a 31 year old Auba 250k/wk to get him to stay. And they’re all just chipper about that. These players would be in mls in a year! Its beyond hypocritical.

Also, the players supposedly being mad can spare me the bullshit. Layoffs were going to have to come from somewhere eventually. You assholes take exorbitant wages and what do you get the club in return? Lower top 8 and Europa League football at best while making yourselves look like assholes on the internet to get some cheap laughs from your fans. Your exorbitant wages will have to come from somewhere when you cant get the club a maximization of revenue.
 
Last edited:

BehindEnemyLines

Twisting a Melon with the Rev. Black Grape
Apr 13, 2006
4,634
13,387
So Stan is worth 10 billion and his wife is worth 8 billion and they can’t afford to keep 55 staff members whilst at the same time paying out millions for new & existing contracts

Absolutely disgusting and immoral

Scum ****s but I’m sure it won’t be the last club we see doing this kind of thing
Whilst I agree with the sentiment, I don't think Stan Kroenke is the owner of Arsenal........he is merely a major shareholder. Financial doping when you don't own the club would be daft and disparate to the financial structure and purpose of being a shareholder. As a boardmember he is obligated to do whatever is in the shareholders interests (i.e. to increase shareholder wealth).
 

SpartanSpur

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2011
12,552
43,063
I just don't see how a club can look at a player like Ozil costing them circa £18m a year for absolutely nothing and then justify cutting 55 people's jobs just to save £1-2m as a necessary saving, let alone offering stupid money to Willian, a player they arguably don't need.

I get that business can be ruthless but you'd like to think that football clubs are in such a privileged position that they could show some more ethics in times like this.

I'd be ashamed if we did that right now.
 

WorcesterTHFC

Well-Known Member
May 4, 2016
1,786
2,558
The last paragraph of the article says: "Arsenal for most of their history became distinguished, and admired, as a club who did things the right way. This is anything but."

While I completely agree with the sentiment, would somebody have any idea about the bit that I've italicised? While I'm obviously biased, I can't remember a single reason why they might have been considered "distinguished, and admired, as a club who did things the right way".
If I could meet the writer of that article, I'd have two words to say: 'Henry Norris'.
 

King of Otters

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2012
10,751
36,094
The bright spot is they cut their scout who found Martinelli, Cesc, Bellerin and a few others. He will quickly be picked up by someone and Arsenal will lose his talents.

That's interesting, as I assumed it was just non football/technical staff being laid off.

I think this probably indicates the downgrading of Arsenal's status of a club overall, with Covid the final nail in the coffin.

They've gone from being guaranteed CL football every year, to being completely shut out of the top 4 (lol).

Sooner or later that is going to result in a serious cost-cutting throughout the club.
 

hellava_tough

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2005
9,429
12,383
So will they keep PEA and if so, is it good business?

When you crunch all the numbers, Arsenal should probably be selling him this summer and reinvesting, because if he leaves next summer, he'll go for nothing. And if he signs a new deal, they'll end up with an Ozil situation as he gets older. Is he genuinely going to be scoring 20+ league goals, every season, as he progresses through his 30s?

I doubt they will sell him though; they're not pragmatic enough. That said, he may force a move, or simply not sign a contract and go for free next summer anyway.
 

yankspurs

Enic Out
Aug 22, 2013
41,962
71,378
So will they keep PEA and if so, is it good business?

When you crunch all the numbers, Arsenal should probably be selling him this summer and reinvesting, because if he leaves next summer, he'll go for nothing. And if he signs a new deal, they'll end up with an Ozil situation as he gets older. Is he genuinely going to be scoring 20+ league goals, every season, as he progresses through his 30s?

I doubt they will sell him though; they're not pragmatic enough. That said, he may force a move, or simply not sign a contract and go for free next summer anyway.
They apparently offered 250k/wk. He’d be nuts not to take that. Unless he wants CL, he should absolutely accept that offer and extend his stay in Europe longer than another 2 years.
 
Top