People have been joking about this today but I actually think it may happen. It worked for the Lo Celso deal, assuming Edouard's sell-on clause is structured in the same manner I don't see why it wouldn't work again (though obviously that is subject to the terms of the contract itself).
I'm sure Levy would be more than happy to use this method again if it means that we pay substantially less than structuring it as an outright purchase would require in order for Celtic to get their desired fee.
Dunno why some kind of deal involving Parrot was not agreed as I read Celtic were interested in loaning him.
Maybe Parrott wanted to stay in London.Dunno why some kind of deal involving Parrot was not agreed as I read Celtic were interested in loaning him.
how do you see him fitting with kaneI watch a lot of Celtic because quite a few of my mates are Celtic fans, pace and power are exactly what he's all about, he'd be a star here, he's got the lot
Maybe we wanted Parrott to stay in London too.Maybe Parrott wanted to stay in London.
Good question, it depends what formation Jose will be putting out but he can play instead of Kane but also alongside him imo, he's Celtic's stand out player, their last striker that came to the PL did ok (Henrik Larsen)how do you see him fitting with kane
Posting here because it's not itk, but not sure how there is a legal point to stop two clubs agreeing a deal, especially when loan deal with obligation to buy is very popular right now.Plus, any creative numbers we try to do i.e. big loan fee other add-ons etc PSG are gonna not let it happen twice to them from us ala Lo Celso, and sure would do everything from a legal point to stop it
A combination of playing for PSG and being involved in a drive by shooting set him back a bit. Been outstanding for us since he signed and imo has more tools than Dembele who’s banging them in for Lyon. Eddy likely go to the very top. Similar feeling with Van Dijk.