under armour new kits

[CosmicHotspur]

Daws has a long-term deal with them.

http://sport-locker.net/2012/01/13/michael-dawson-signs-for-under-armour/

 

[mil1lion]

This is obviously the real reason Pav wants to leave.

 

[#1 Spur]

All UA gear is absolutely top class quality.

 

[ajspurs]

All UA gear is absolutely top class quality.

Yea but their past/present football kits aren't exactly to die for, same with their tennis gear. It's their training stuff that's top notch.

 

[Graysonti]

I'm looking forward to it

 

[Bobbins]

At least when they take their uninspiring shirts off their baselayer stuff will look great!

 

[StartingPrice]

Daws has a long-term deal with them.

http://sport-locker.net/2012/01/13/michael-dawson-signs-for-under-armour/

Daws looks like he has a hangover or is recovering from malaria or summit, in that pic...perhaps that is the effect their gear has on the wearer :shrug:

 

[akie]

I like the puma kits we have had

 

[Kendall]

I like the puma kits we have had

The first string we had were awful. Not terrible design-wise, but the potato sack material and badges that come off in the wash were terrible.

 

[whitelightwhiteheat]

The past two season we've had triffic kits, so it would be a shame if we go backwards now. I don't think anything will beat the 2010/11 home kit for me. Best kit we've had in years and years!

 

[Gbspurs]

Wait and see I guess but I'm predicted a horrible shirt. My personal favs of recent memory are last years "investec" home shirt, 2001 adidas home short and 2005 shirt with blue sleeves and thomson Logo. Im guessing the years though!

 

[Paxtonite]

Wait and see I guess but I'm predicted a horrible shirt. My personal favs of recent memory are last years "investec" home shirt, 2001 adidas home short and 2005 shirt with blue sleeves and thomson Logo. Im guessing the years though!

Thought the 2005 shirt with blue sleeves was disgusting. Almost a negative of Arse kit. We should NEVER have different colour sleeves just because of that.

Under Armour will be fine. Wait until its out and you'll all be loving it.

 

[Phantom]

Always liked under armour, have plenty of their stuff. But as others have pointed out their kits have not looked great from what I have seen so far.

 

[piedpiper]

anyone seen the kit deal Liverpool just signed 150 million pounds over 6 years. 25 million a season. well that is huge........ how much did we get from under armour......... it pales in comparison me thinks or was that deal liverpool signed to get around the fairplay rules coming into effect soon.

 

[beals]

I thought our was £50m over two years, £25m per yer?

 

[#1 Spur]

We have UA for 5 years.

The value of the sponsorship has not been revealed, although some reports put it as high as £10m a season.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12685894

 

[beals]

£10m a season hmm not so good then.

 

[piedpiper]

£10m a season hmm not so good then.

from a branding perspective we are way off these guys. liverpool have won nothing of note (bar the CL trophy) in 20 years and they pull off that kind of deal, second only Barca's deal. the cynic in me says this has everything to do with the financial fair play rule coming in. Or it is pretty amazing negotiating on the part of the new american owners.

 

[Super Tottenham]

Don't they also supply the Red Sox. Maybe it's a way of shifting money recieved from one of Fenway's companies to another for FFP.

 

[mrbrightside73]

Judging by Warriors output, paying somebody 25 million a season to wear that shit seems cheap