- May 17, 2018
- 11,872
- 47,993
Two.
Ah yeah, 3 - 1 isn't 3 bad maths
Two.
They were all shit. We should have won the League today and become champions of the universe. I've had it. Maureen and Baldy need to go and take that shit stadium with them.Missed the game today.
How did we lineup? Which players occupied which positions?
Anyone impress/ disappoint etc?
Thanks
Undoubtedly. He’s a clear level above Poch
Missed the game today.
How did we lineup? Which players occupied which positions?
Anyone impress/ disappoint etc?
Thanks
FYPNobody i like started, Jose has a stupid face and Gary Lineker laughed at my shoes and did a shit on the pitch.
Have a good night buddy your not wrong good banter love it!!!Good night folks! Thai curry and beers time. Banter has been great this evening!!
If this was the grammar thread I'd have said "you're" but it ain't, so I shan't.Have a good night buddy your not wrong good banter love it!!!
Some great feedback- cheers
Thing is with offsides the frame rate isn’t accurate enough to tell and the debate is where you draw the line too With Hawkeye it’s either all over the line or not. It worksJust heard a commentator say that the goal line decision system ruling Lamela‘a chance not a goal by a millimeter is technology working at its best. Same people who say technology ruling someone offside by a millimeter (another objective decision) is ruining the spirit of the game by denying goals... I lose my mind sometimes.
Missed the game today.
How did we lineup? Which players occupied which positions?
Anyone impress/ disappoint etc?
Thanks
Missed the game today.
How did we lineup? Which players occupied which positions?
Anyone impress/ disappoint etc?
Thanks
Two crucial differences for me. One, the offside technology is good, but not yet objective - it isn't perfect at measuring the frame at which the ball left the boot, and I don't think it can ever be perfect at measuring where the body ends and the arm starts. Secondly,
i agree it works, I think offside works too! Sure, you have to decide on framerate rule, I don’t see the need to get worked up over 1/24 of a second, just decide the frame before at or after and apply to all.Thing is with offsides the frame rate isn’t accurate enough to tell and the debate is where you draw the line too With Hawkeye it’s either all over the line or not. It works
Strange - I thought Winks was fineReferee wasn't exactly favouring us. Had quite a few decent chances from Son, Lamela etc that wouldn't have looked out of place coming from Sissoko. Gazzaniga gets SC immunity for a few days because he saved a penalty and kept a clean sheet. Winks had a stinker. Lamela was about 1cm away from a goal.
Half expected us to lose, as Pearson has had Watford on Liverpool form, but SC has still fallen apart at the seams regardless.
Strange - I thought Winks was fine
Not many pundits predicted that we would win today. I personally would rather have Doucoure than Winks, Deeney over Moura, and Saar over Lamela.This isn't good enough, we have better players than Watford but you wouldn't know it from that game.
Fuck I wish I had that much hair lol ??