What's new

Archway sheet metal works on fire

Colonel_Klinck

Well-Known Member
May 19, 2004
12,719
23,323
Without trying to get too deep into it, I think a lot of it has to do with the fact that you don't have a government owned by the wealthiest tiny percentage of people on the planet. Our 1% owns over 99% of our nation's assets, and they're the ones running the government.

As the political philosopher Alan Moore once said (and famously paraphrased in the wonderful V for Vendetta), "'People shouldn't be afraid of their government. Governments should be afraid of their people."

With the resources and weapons at the disposal of the modern US government, removing the right to bear arms of the American people is unthinkable. This is certainly not to imply each are at odds with one another, or that one should ever even attempt direct physical harm on the other, but that balance of power has to be maintained.

On the surface I don't blame you at all, but I can assure you life here is nothing like what the media portrays with the frequency of shootings and violence. In fact, shooting numbers have actually dropped in all but one city here in the US in the last decade/

But Jesus, one camera/10-14 people. Do you give a thumbs up to the camera while having a wank?

But surely this is just an illusion? Doesn't matter how many of the public are armed you aren't going to stand up up to the State. And with only 30% of them being armed it's even more futile. Peaceful or should I say unarmed protest has always achieved more ie abolition, women's vote ect ect. Saying all that though, if I lived in rural US I'd probably be armed to the teeth just because I could be
 

ERO

The artist f.k.a Steffen Freund - Mentalist ****
Jun 8, 2003
5,918
5,275
This is SpursManChris we're talking about. He's probably asking the questions now-e.g. why firefighters were called at 05:00 instead of 04:59
00ddce11eb42d72fd22ab4b7d9875eea4419fd39916dbe8dd946dfe8558ec180.jpg
 

mk_spur

Active Member
Feb 28, 2006
628
793
Sure dan the man can turn a pound note out of this as he bowls up to josif and hands him his newly printed business card.
E = extinguishers
N =nullify
I = impending
C = catastrophe
 

DaSpurs

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2013
11,816
13,655
But surely this is just an illusion? Doesn't matter how many of the public are armed you aren't going to stand up up to the State. And with only 30% of them being armed it's even more futile. Peaceful or should I say unarmed protest has always achieved more ie abolition, women's vote ect ect. Saying all that though, if I lived in rural US I'd probably be armed to the teeth just because I could be

No, but again it's not the "tangible" or "physical" strength itself, it's the ability to have access to arms that keeps things in check. I for one completely agree with Moore and V, the best form of government is most conducive when it is held more liable to the demands of its people, rather than vice versa. If you truly intend to create a government intended to protect "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (property in the original line)," it follows then that this government should be subject to its people, not the other way around.

I wish we could say peaceful resolution has resolved more, but that's not actually the case as it's only really worked in the last century in the scale of millenia of human history. As a bit more of a touchy case in point, the colonists had to wage an entire war simply for initially asking to be represented before taxation.

It is however, far and away ideally how everything should be resolved, and it's certainly a wonderful thing that the frequency of resolution per conflict has continued to sway in the direction of peaceful methods.
 

Dundalk_Spur

The only Spur in the village
Jul 17, 2008
4,960
7,695
We have blamed various people but surely its Adebayors penalty against Basle re-entering the atmosphere???
 

SpurSince57

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2006
45,213
8,229
There are probably 5 knives to every adult in England . I do not walk the streets terrified of being stabbed. I am more worried about losing my privacy than losing my life to violence.

Is Big Brother threatening to install CCTV throughout your house?
 

remember91

Active Member
Apr 10, 2005
528
208
Maybe I'm wrong, but from my limited experience working in the insurance industry, this has fraud written all over it. I've seen the same scenario (although maybe not on this level) a million times before, and I wouldn't give these people the time of day.

Here is how it works:

1) Find a bullshit reason to inflate the value of your resource. (I.e. it may only be a £500k property but the big football team wants to buy it so it should be worth £500M).

2) Pull out before the insurance company have a reason to deflate the value of the resource you have insured and thus pay you less money (I.e. court case forcing you to sell to the big football club).

3) Burn the property and take the insurance money based upon your own valuation and strike it rich

Unfortunately (Sorry fortunately), this never works. Funnily enough, big insurance firms, who hire lots of top notch lawyers, do not generally fall into such easy traps. The insurance companies investigators will do a far more thorough job than the police as they have money on it. Any insurance investigator who looks into this will smell a rat a mile away.

Don't get me wrong, it may be a rogue Spurs fan, but this scenario fills the A-Z of insurance con jobs.
 

tiger666

Large Member
Jan 4, 2005
27,978
82,216
Maybe I'm wrong, but from my limited experience working in the insurance industry, this has fraud written all over it. I've seen the same scenario (although maybe not on this level) a million times before, and I wouldn't give these people the time of day.

Here is how it works:

1) Find a bullshit reason to inflate the value of your resource. (I.e. it may only be a £500k property but the big football team wants to buy it so it should be worth £500M).

2) Pull out before the insurance company have a reason to deflate the value of the resource you have insured and thus pay you less money (I.e. court case forcing you to sell to the big football club).

3) Burn the property and take the insurance money based upon your own valuation and strike it rich

Unfortunately (Sorry fortunately), this never works. Funnily enough, big insurance firms who hire lots of top notch lawyers do not generally fall into such easy traps. The insurance companies investigators will do a far more thorough job than the police as they have money on it.

Don't get me wrong, it may be a rogue Spurs fan, but this scenario fills the A-Z of insurance con jobs.

Or so you'd like us to think :shifty:
 
Top