- May 20, 2005
- 9,694
- 3,198
King without a doubt
You way you need to look at it is who is missed more when his not playing. When Kings outwe have kaboul/gardner when berbas out we have proven premiership quality in bent or defoe
But where would we have finished had Berbs not been playing last season or where would we be now if he wasn't paying this season? Berbs just hides the fact how poor our midifeld is since Carrick left. All the defensive problems this season have again hidden just how poor we are in this respect. Last season we didn't have King and suffered as a result. Anti Jol fans won't accept it, but results very strongly suggest we'd have finished in the top 4 had King been fit for all our games last season with. However, had we not had Berbatov, I think we'd have finished around 9th. He created and scored so many that we'd have not scored the previous season, or this seaon witht he likes of Bent, Mido, Kenae or Defoe. Had it not been for Berbs brilliance we'd have noticed just how much we miss Carrick, as he was not only our best deffensive midfielder, but made the most goals and started most of our moves. Bent, Defoe and Keane can't create in the way Berbs does. There is no clear choice between King and Berbs. Anyone who suggests there is being swayed by bias to one player and not football reallity.