- Feb 18, 2006
- 6,409
- 10,931
- Thread starter
- #81
What would Bill Nic think of all this?, the way the game has changed from having about three or four defensive players at the back and about five or so attacking players. As the years have gone by players have been droping from attacking positions to defensive ones where today we are saying the way forward for us is to have one striker on the pitch. I agree that to be succesfull we will have to adopt such tactics but i'm not sure i'll enjoy it as much.
If the system is played well then the team has 2 highly attacking fullbacks and a front 4 (the 3+1) who have almost no defensive responsibilities, this makes it more offensive than 4-4-2 where generally the full backs aren't as attacking. Most importantly, however, attacking teams who play it well control the ball from the midfield and this is the key to playing attacking football. It seems a lot of people confuse 4-5-1 with 4-2-3-1 just because they both have 1 up top, I'm not as tactically eloquent as IOMLS but the 2 systems aren't the same at all.