Game for game comparison 20/21
- Thread starter Hakkz
- Start date
13VanDerBale13
Well-Known Member
- Jul 12, 2011
- 14,512
- 34,132
We lost our next 3 games last season, lord have mercy if history repeats itself
onthetwo
Well-Known Member
- May 19, 2006
- 4,585
- 3,407
looks like we have 7 'winnable' matches before an International break mid-November followed by City and Chelsea back to back so lets hope yesterday was a 'blip' like the Sheff Utd match last season and we can start to get our shit together again like we did after that abomination of a performance.
Lighty64
I believe
- Aug 24, 2010
- 10,400
- 12,476
Updated. Going forwards I will add goals/short highlights from the last season's corresponding fixture to refresh our memories ahead of the game.
please don't, a lot of them weren't too clever
Scissors&Tape
Well-Known Member
- May 17, 2018
- 259
- 1,007
So I understand what I'm seeing here...In the line graph, the lines represent how many points better or worse we were compared to the previous season after playing the same fixtures. The red line represents the current season (20/21) compared to last season (19/20), while the blue line represents last season (19/20) to the season before (18/19).
I thought I understood the bar graph, but I too don't understand how we could ever have a ppg over 3.
Also, might I suggest being consistent with the colors and years in each graph. It took a while to realize that red was 19/20 and blue was 20/21 in the first graph but vice versa in the second.
Thanks for doing this!
I thought I understood the bar graph, but I too don't understand how we could ever have a ppg over 3.
Also, might I suggest being consistent with the colors and years in each graph. It took a while to realize that red was 19/20 and blue was 20/21 in the first graph but vice versa in the second.
Thanks for doing this!
Hakkz
Svensk hetsporre
- Jul 6, 2012
- 8,196
- 17,270
- Thread starter
- #14
You are both absolutely right, I hadn't caught that. I don't know why it showed 3,5ppg either because when I hovered over the graph it gave me y=2. Now I have fiddled with it and it should be right. I also changed the colours for consistency. Input greatly appreciated!
austinfh
Well-Known Member
- Aug 9, 2016
- 1,205
- 7,819
Was just looking at the points per game and wondering what's required to win the league (I know I'm being very optimistic but I was just curious).
2019/20 - Liverpool - 2.61 ppg
2018/19 - Man City - 2.58 ppg
2017/18 - Man City - 2.63 ppg
2016/17 - Chelsea - 2.45 ppg (for reference we had 2.26 ppg)
2015/16 - Leicester - 2.13 ppg
2019/20 - Liverpool - 2.61 ppg
2018/19 - Man City - 2.58 ppg
2017/18 - Man City - 2.63 ppg
2016/17 - Chelsea - 2.45 ppg (for reference we had 2.26 ppg)
2015/16 - Leicester - 2.13 ppg
BringBack_leGin
Well-Known Member
- Jul 28, 2004
- 27,719
- 54,929
Crazy season so far. We’ve taken 7 points from matches which yielded 0 last season, but only 1 from matches which yielded 6. 2 points up is still 2 points up. Good news is we only managed 5 points from our next 3 matches equivalents last season, so with the opponents in mind we have a chance to make big inroads into having a good season before we face a challenging run.
BringBack_leGin
Well-Known Member
- Jul 28, 2004
- 27,719
- 54,929
Agreed. For whatever reason, I just don’t see any team that looks like getting a 90+ season (sorry Dean Smith).
I reckon if we break the 70 mark were top 4, and if we can break the 85 mark we’ve won it. Seems a long way off after last night but I see more to be encouraged about then to be fearful about.
Hakkz
Svensk hetsporre
- Jul 6, 2012
- 8,196
- 17,270
- Thread starter
- #20
Unless someone suddenly puts a proper run together, then it will be quite scrappy in the end. We still have every chance to be in the mix at the end of the season if we get our shit together defensively, I don't think scoring goals will be the issue.
