- Jun 20, 2004
- 1,948
- 6,430
Pretty pissed off if this is going to be the case unless the young striker is FergusonNew in the ITK thread from dovakhin, it will be a young forward, Richarlison will get the tob job if Harry goes.
Pretty pissed off if this is going to be the case unless the young striker is FergusonNew in the ITK thread from dovakhin, it will be a young forward, Richarlison will get the tob job if Harry goes.
I actually think that makes a lot of sense, especially if the young player can double up as a wide forward (and are, y'know, not shit at football).New in the ITK thread from dovakhin, it will be a young forward, Richarlison will get the tob job if Harry goes.
I think one could even be slightly excited about the situation. Not ideal, of course, but it would be very interesting to see who we bring in and (if they are Ange’s choice) what he can do with them.I am pretty relaxed about the latest ITK, there's nothing I can control about the situation so why stress about it.
I agree, but many fans aren't going to like losing Kane and not signing a big name to offset that, whether as a striker or somewhere else on the pitch.I think we should give Richarlison a chance in the main role. Not least because any attempt at directly replacing Harry is bound to be a disappointment. He is irreplaceable as a player like Bale and Modric were but we can still evolve like we did with Eriksen, Dembele and Harry.
I am pretty relaxed about the latest ITK, there's nothing I can control about the situation so why stress about it.
Gvardiol or bust!I agree, but many fans aren't going to like losing Kane and not signing a big name to offset that, whether as a striker or somewhere else on the pitch.
Even Levy will surely be aware of the optics there, right or wrong.
Pretty pissed off if this is going to be the case unless the young striker is Ferguson
I also think there’s a reasonable chance Son ends up playing more as a 9 than a wing. He’s really not a great fit as the wide forward in this system in my opinion. We’re not going to be able to do it all in one window.I think we should give Richarlison a chance in the main role. Not least because any attempt at directly replacing Harry is bound to be a disappointment. He is irreplaceable as a player like Bale and Modric were but we can still evolve like we did with Eriksen, Dembele and Harry.
Fantastic post mate!
"Everything about us is pretending to be a big club, but we're not. Were a brand that has figured out how to maximize the amount of cash we can fleece whilst spending as little as possible on the actual football team".
The quote is such a good summary of our club, or should I say entertainment brand. Might as well make it our motto, as that's basically what we are.
Sadly, absolutely nothing will change as long as the money keep flowing to ENIC. Brilliantly done by Levy and ENIC (from an investment perspective
Also Ange has said that as well, so would be happy with this alsoI’m actually ok with giving Richy a go. The way Ange plays will suit him very well as he can act as the aggressive poacher instead of trying to do what Kane has been doing!
I’m guessing the young striker will be a semi experienced one as we already have young strikers on the books who are highly thought of:
Scarlett, Donley, Soonsup-Bell, Lankshear etc
RichieIf and when Kane departs, who is getting penalty duties??
He signed a new contract a month ago.Nico Williams please