The trouble with Jenas is he doesn't catch the eye, he doesn't stand out. In some positions that's not such a bad thing - certain types of centre back quell the danger without making spectacular tackles, headers etc. but instead read the game well so they don't need to. But in central midfield it's a bit different, especially at the top level. When it comes to midfielders making cautious passes, it's fine when they are defensive, and their main job is to win us the ball and move it on, but Jenas isn't a holding midfielder.
I'm not blaming last night on Jenas, because the others had a poor game, but in general, over the longterm he hasn't offered enough as a box to boxer. He almost needs to be part of a 5 man midfield, because he can't be relied on to be the main creative influence or holding player. We like to play with two forwards, so for me he isn't right for us now.
The longterm ? It was only in January that we actualy bought a player that could do the holding job to allow Jenas to get forward. Since then , he has been a lot better at doing so, he's also been out with an injury for a while and in the meantime Palacios has struggled so we're back to where we were, with Jenas unable to get forward because the midfield elsewhere is wobbling a little.
If Palacios is on his game then Jenas tends to be to