- Jan 27, 2011
- 12,562
- 43,111
Agreed but Utd are the richest club on earth and he was bought to be first choice.
If they can get it, good on them.
We can already do that by playing Son down the middle and putting either Bergwijn or Sessegnon on the left. I’d wager based on Son’s performances in Kanes absence and the very good start Bergwijn has made that whoever we sign, that’ll still be plan A when Kane doesn’t play unless whoever we sign makes an unexpectedly great early impression.
This signing is to come off the bench most matches (resting Kane when we’re winning, partnering him when we need a goal) and to start in place of him in cup matches v weaker opposition.
Agree on Son likely being first choice when Kane is injured but that doesn't help with fixture congestion. I think most of us were hoping the likes of Son and Kane wouldn't even be travelling to the likes of Plovdiv and the new ST would be instead. Maybe Lamela will play as a false 9 if he hasn't be sold by then.
The frustrating thing is we wrapped up 2 of the three big holes in the squad nice and early, it's a shame we don't seem like adding a striker before the season starts. Hopefully the wait will be worth it.