- Aug 25, 2010
- 55,263
- 100,639
No mate - I just see the team selection and watch the games and put two and two together.
Sissoko is clearly being asked to play limited and defined role. He played that role fine on Thursday night.
Just because you don't like the role (I don't particularly either btw) doesn't mean he played badly on Thursday. He didn't. The system and set up led to an almost complete dominance allowing us to play pretty much in their half for the entire game and try and score by overwhelming numbers and attrition. The defensive side of it worked (apart from a worldy screamer of a goal) - and that's clearly Sissoko's remit.
I know it's annoying that he only seems to pass sideways and backwards but seeing as its pretty much all he ever does when playing that role in that system yet he keeps being selected - then Occam's razor suggests that he playing to instruction. And playing it to the Coach's acceptance.
So, yes he played fine on Thursday night. You are angry at the role not the performance.
But if you can't see that by now, there's not much point going over it again and again.
West Ham were happy to cede territory and possession, choosing to double up on Son and Eriksen etc
When Dier and Sissoko were on the ball they wernt exactly being pressed by West Ham.
There was no need for two defensive minded midfielders the other night, all it did was reduce our chances of breaking them down.
There was no midfield battle to win, West Ham never set up to take us on in the middle of the park. Moyes parked two buses and we needed more quality on the ball to help break them down.
In no way was that Sissoko's fault. I actually think Sissoko works very well for some games, but the other night was not the game for him and for me we were somewhat tactically flawed.
But even after getting it wrong, Pochettino should of acted a lot sooner than he did.