- May 12, 2008
- 360
- 437
Our business model is based on player development. Our training centre is among the best in the world and we have an excellent academy. We also have a modern, knowledgable department for identifying players with the correct profile for the club. Clearly, we are focused on long-term, sustainable success.
With this in mind, should we be doing more to develop our own coaches? Should we be aiming for a model which sees the first team coach promoted from within? Thanks to Poch, we're developing a real identity and his ideas are being embedded throughout the club. Having some up and coming coaches learning from him would be no bad thing.
Clearly, we simply want the best staff at the club but I'm definitely attracted to a continuity of Poch's philosophies once he inevitibly departs. Could cultivating his ideas amongst our coaches be his real legacy?
With this in mind, should we be doing more to develop our own coaches? Should we be aiming for a model which sees the first team coach promoted from within? Thanks to Poch, we're developing a real identity and his ideas are being embedded throughout the club. Having some up and coming coaches learning from him would be no bad thing.
Clearly, we simply want the best staff at the club but I'm definitely attracted to a continuity of Poch's philosophies once he inevitibly departs. Could cultivating his ideas amongst our coaches be his real legacy?