One mistake against a world class player, whose shot could well have been saved at the near post. There's no mathematical formula needed, just a fair acknowledgement. So if the ball had been an inch lower it wouldn't have deserved credit? It was an excellent cross, even if it wasn't placed on top of Kane's head. He made a mistake and took his eye of the player, it happens. Wingers see less of the ball by definition so that's a meaningless statement. It's the lazy throwaway comments of being "inconsequential" and "normal service resumed" that just once again reveal your bias and jaundiced view.