- Jul 23, 2014
- 5,728
- 156,865
I heard similar from a very good source!And he really doesn't like Pulis..
I heard similar from a very good source!And he really doesn't like Pulis..
I heard similar from a very good source!
The secret footballerSpartacus?
http://www.theguardian.com/football/2001/apr/27/newsstory.sport1
Pulis has got a history of profiting from player sales
Pulis also admitted he had lied about how he received the documents when he said in a statement to his solicitors that they had been passed to him anonymously. He also admitted lying when he was asked to return "all club property" at the termination of his contract. He said he had nothing other than a car and a mobile phone, when he knew his consultant, Pack, had the documents.
Is not one of the things you appoint a manager for, especially one like Pulis, is his experiemce and knowledge and contacts so if he brings all of that and his status at the club is a deciding factor for players choosing to come to the club, is he not entitled to remuneration, sort of interlectual property rights?
Nothing untoward about that surely.
Also that article looks like something a notoriously unpleasant chairman with an axe to grind might put to a useful hack.
I refuse to believe that there are managers in the premier league who are nothing more than asset strippers, its bunkum, utter nonsense, their job depends on the success of the team for which they are richly rewarded so why would they sacrifice that for some daft skullduggery.There's a huge conflict of interest in managers taking a cut on players they sign - they'll prefer players where they can take a cut and will have an interest in the fee being as high as possible. That sort of practice is surely against the terms of all managers' contracts with their clubs.
There's a more subtle and perhaps more pernicious conflict of interest in managers taking a cut on players they sell. While it seems to make sense to compensate them for maximising value, there'll be plenty of situations where managers are incentivised to select certain players over others, not on the strength of their contributions on the pitch, but on the size of bonus their continued selection could unlock. Or they might be incentivised to leave certain players out of the starting 11 for a limited time to encourage them to seek a move. Or they might simply be inclined to treat these players like sh*t so they look for a transfer.
FWIW, despite the odds on Berahino joining Spurs this window being 9/1, I reckon we might get him. Probably more likely we won't than we will, but 9/1 seems out of whack.
Dont forget the shortsAnd a cap, tracksuit, trainers, socks....
During the meeting, which took place in a stand at the Priestfield stadium, Pulis produced a document from the front of his shorts which, he alleged, showed financial irregularities relating to a game against Wycombe Wanderers.
Fucking hell- here we go again lol:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/tottenham-plan-18m-transfer-bid-7250150
Tottenham plan £18m transfer bid for Saido Berahino to see if West Brom will FINALLY sell
"Fuck off". The wording will be different, but the meaning will be exactly the same.I knew it. So predictable and the outcome is just as predictable. I wonder what special message for Levy Peace has lined up for WBA's official site this time?
You can tell the article is bullshit because of the last line "Spurs will pay the £17m up front".Hotspur Related @HotspurRelated 4m4 minutes ago
Daily Mail claim Tottenham Hotspur will make one final offer of £17M for West Brom striker Saido Berahino. #THFC
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...est-Brom-s-misfit-striker-Saido-Berahino.html
I knew it. So predictable and the outcome is just as predictable. I wonder what special message for Levy Peace has lined up for WBA's official site this time?
You can tell the article is bullshit because of the last line "Spurs will pay the £17m up front".
Yeah, right...