- Jun 2, 2011
- 456
- 1,258
Not for me thanks. Too old lost his yard of pace and I thought he was pretty average last season for Chelski. Very expensive wages and offers nothing new
The lads "t'riffic" would be what Harry would say leaning out of his Range Rover on the way home to Portsmouth after we just signed Eto of a free and paid him 500K tax free a week.
Harry would also say "I'm giving back to the fans because having just three letters on the back of their shirt is cheaper than Addebayooor"
Could job Harry is long gone then init
Turned down West Ham, now considering an offer from Sunderland apparently.
A 1 in 2 game goalscorer for every single club he has ever been at , without exception.... on a freebie.
I would take him for a season. Nothing to lose is there really.
Give it a rest, get over it, H is long gone, why do people still think it's funny to have a pop at our most successful manager in a decade, absolutely ridiculous!!
A decade? Since Pleat in the late 80s. As for the most attractive football? Best in my lifetime and I'm 37. It's not just the players available. AVB turned the clock back to the time of Wendy Ramos for attractive football.
On topic Eto'o: it's bad enough being past your sell by date but would be embarrassing if he was joint top earner to boot.
Better than Soldado and on a free would allow money from any Soldado fee in to be spent on improving attacking midfield areas where there's a chronic lack of invention
Give it a rest, get over it, H is long gone, why do people still think it's funny to have a pop at our most successful manager in a decade, absolutely ridiculous!!
Easy fella, that's not even close to being true. A successful manager does a thing called 'winning something'. I know the guy did well & took us into the CL, but he 'won' the square route of fuck all. When it comes to 'success', even Juande Ramos comes out on top of Redknapp.
Sorry if that offends you, I am just old fashioned & people thinking 4th is a sign of success is just something I'll never buy into. 4th is just the 3rd best at losing!
Everyone has their own opinion of what constitutes 'success'. I disagree with the notion of simply winning a cup makes you successful. By that arguement George Graham is right up there. I personally go for the arguement of sustained highest placed league finishes (along with Jol), returning hope and pride and a style and panache missing under Juande, Graham and most recently under AVB.
What is a lot harder to argue against is the style of play under Redknapp. We were most neutral's second team at that point.
Easy fella, that's not even close to being true. A successful manager does a thing called 'winning something'. I know the guy did well & took us into the CL, but he 'won' the square route of fuck all. When it comes to 'success', even Juande Ramos comes out on top of Redknapp.
Sorry if that offends you, I am just old fashioned & people thinking 4th is a sign of success is just something I'll never buy into. 4th is just the 3rd best at losing!
Fair play, it's your right to disagree. If you don't perceive 'winning a trophy' as something of 'a success', who am I to argue?
I'll also counter your "sustained highest placed league finishes", with "consecutive end of season slumps". Whilst I'll ask you this question.... Redknapp got 70 points & finished 4th, our highest ever PL finish, whilst AVB got 72 points, our biggest ever PL points haul. Which one was more 'successful' ?