Apart from the fact that we were warned by nearly everyone that this would be the case after he gets a permenant contract.
Can you point me to some hard evidence of this? I've not seen anything other than a few stories from poor sources.Clearly not as we tried to sign him back this summer. But in typical Levy fashion we left it too late.
Exactly.
All these threads about getting Modric and Berbs back are nice, but the fact of the matter is simple:
Fuck with Levy, the bridge is burned.
Forever.
No I don't think AVB was banging down any doors to sign Berba, but then equally I don't think he was doing so to sign Dempsey either
You may not be 100% sure that Berbatov would have banged in the goals for us now, but I am certain he would have done so, more than Ade, Defoe or Dempsey and more importantly his football brain, hold up play and ability to link would have made us a better attacking force I have no doubt
I think it is pretty undeniable that Berbatov would have been a better signing for us than Dempsey was, work rate doesn't match class and while Dempsey has maybe got some undeserved stick he also has been generally poor and I find it hard to imagine anyone thinking we wouldn't have been better off had we resigned Berbatove
Yes I also doubt Berba was a target for AVB but I doubt Dempsey was also
As for Levy, yes I agree he probably didn't want him but like I said to me that smacks of cutting our nose off to spite our face like when Sugar went on his anti Carlos kicaball rant post Klinsmann and set us back years while teams like Arsenal built a small dynasty with players like Bergkamp, Overmars, henry, Pires and Vieira and we wasted small fortunes on Fox, Armstrong, Sinton and Ferdinand
Put the good of the club first, signing Berba back instead of Dempsey would have been better for the club and if Levy dismissed it due to personal issues with the way Berba left the club I feel that was a mistake (of course this is hypothetical as I don't know for sure what Levy's position was)
But a quick reality check would have established this was just bullshit spouted by gooners a little bit bitter at becoming ManC's feeder club.
Maybe in future do your own research maybe? Its not hard to find, the story was in every newspaper and almost every media outlet in the country. http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11661/8048705/Spurs-made-Berbatov-bidCan you point me to some hard evidence of this? I've not seen anything other than a few stories from poor sources.
firsthand evidence would suggest that it isnt bullshit though. Predications have been spot on.
On the subject of Berba. No brainer, had we had a half decent striker this season we would be comfortable CL already. Had we had a top drawer striker (ie Berba) it could have been fucking beautiful.
ManC paid twenty odd million for Adebayor based on performances for Arsenal when he was contracted. He also performed very well initially at City, again, with a contract already in place. Gooners spouting that nonsense are talking out of their arses.
The truth is that Adebayor, for whatever reasons is not the most emotionally strong players. It's got fuck all to do with whether he's secured a contract or not. More internal issues of his psyche.
Maybe in future do your own research maybe? Its not hard to find, the story was in every newspaper and almost every media outlet in the country. http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11661/8048705/Spurs-made-Berbatov-bid
Whilst I agree largely, your second sentence leaves a bad taste in the mouth. I get what you're saying but fair play to Fulham. No reason at all they shouldn't have a skilful player on their books. Just sounds like those yanited and Chelsea wankers talking about Berbatov/Modric/Bale/whoever playing for us.I voted yes from a purely footballing standpoint.
Watching Fulham last night its painful to see just how good he is and how wasted he is at Craven Cottage.
There's things we will never know about many transfers, but considering we tried to hijack the deal at the last minute(he was having his medical at Fulham) , it is my own opinion that he didnt want to fuck over Martin Jol, who lets not forget brought him to Spurs all those years ago.It doesn't actually state why he didn't come though.
The fact that we made a bid doesn't lend much support for the DL was guilty of pride reasoning though does it? If DL wasn't interested/baawing with epic butthurt, there'd have been no bid made. He agreed to join about 150 clubs in the space of 2 days. Maybe we were just too late to the party?
There's things we will never know about many transfers, but considering we tried to hijack the deal at the last minute(he was having his medical at Fulham) , it is my own opinion that he didnt want to fuck over Martin Jol, who lets not forget brought him to Spurs all those years ago.
Aye, just half-answered this myself. Thinking out loud day for me obviously.I agree with your first part. However do we actually know the circumstances regarding the second part? As you rightly say he was flashing his knickers at plenty of other clubs but is it correct to assume that we lost out because we came in too late (even if it is the most likely scenario)?
I suppose we will probably never find out and in any case it doesn't really matter now.