- Nov 29, 2004
- 36,269
- 115,401
Has he ever played anything else?
Unfortunately not, no.
Has he ever played anything else?
Lloris
Yedlin Dier Vertonghen Ogilvie
Winks Mason Bentaleb
Lamela Kane Eriksen
Or if we have to go with Poch's 4231:
Lloris
Yedlin Dier Vertonghen Ogilvie
Mason Bentaleb
Lamela Onomah Eriksen
Kane
I really don't think this is the right game to bring in 3 young players. If we get hammered that would be not great for their confidence. Play them in the last 3 matches by all means. Also, now that Chadli has started scoring again I don't think leaving him out makes sense.
It's about taking a longer term stance, rather than worrying about this next game (or next 4). No one is (or should) going to let these kids be ruined by what happens in their first game or two. Just look at the patience we've shown with Mason, Carroll, Pritchard etc. We are not going to judge them on their first few appearances. But there won't be a better set of circumstances to give them first team experience than now. The next four games are utterly meaningless. They can come in under much less pressure, which should allow them to express themselves a little better, play with a little less fear.
I'm all for baptism with fire/dropping the kid into the pool to teach it to swim, but City might be a bit much. I completely and wholeheartedly agree with you about the other remaining matches this term, but City would prey vehemently on our back line with that little experience in it. We have games we should have played them in and should play them in before the season runs out, but I wouldn't play them in this one. That's baptism in the the fires of hell.
Like Dier at RB, Davies at LB, Chiriches or Fazio as CB's fills you with confidence or is a better match for what City have got ?
Like Dier at RB, Davies at LB, Chiriches or Fazio as CB's fills you with confidence or is a better match for what City have got ?
City isn't the game to give an academy player his debut at left back BC, can't believe you would actually do it if you had that decision to make for real. Crazy scenes.
Admittedly, touche, but Ogilvie and Onomah I wouldn't play in this one, and as you may have noted I've been advocating Onomah to get his first start for awhile. Yedlin I would play, as I agree with you entirely we could do with more runs off Lamela and I think Dier is a very poor fullback. Yedlin has already faced some of the best attacking mids on the planet and in the sweltering heat of Brazil with World Cup pressure, but that's eons beyond anything Ogilvie has faced. Navas will come out of the tunnel with a hard-on poking the guy ahead of him if he sees Ogilvie on the sheet.
But even so, I have to agree, it's not as if Davies will give me much more confidence either. Regardless, if we're going to be done on that side, I'd prefer it not to be at the expense of wrecking a youth debutant's confidence.
But no-one's going to let it wreck his confidence. The coaching staff will make sure of that. And better, if it is going to happen, that he gets embarrassed by some of the best players in the league than other, lesser perceived players.
No-one's going to hound him out the club or write off his career if Navas or Silva give him a hard game. In my experience these kids rarely let you down for effort and commitment, and imagine if they actually have a decent game - the huge confidence boost that will give them and what difference it could make to our summer transfer strategy.
@DaSpurs @Bus-Conductor Who cares. It is not as if the match is very important either way, I don't think who starts matter much. In fact the result is of so little importance that we might even end up winning it.
Result of no importance -> less in game pressure -> less risk of starting "wrong" players or starting players at a "wrong" time.I couldn't care less about the result, in fact as of September I thought we didn't stand a chance in hell at top four unless we decided to address obvious weaknesses in January, which we didn't. What I care about is not exposing a promising youth to a dangerous situation psychologically, that is it.
Result of no importance -> less in game pressure -> less risk of starting "wrong" players or starting players at a "wrong" time.
Agreed. It's a pity it wouldn't be on a larger stadiumThat undoubtedly helps, but doesn't entirely counter it.
A 19 year old fullback with top defensive responsibility who has played nothing but youth football his entire life at nearly empty stadiums at most, to playing in front of 40,000 present fans, cameras everywhere, knowledge millions all over the world would be watching, and against one of the best sides in the world. That frame of reference is everything, as he has nothing to compare it to in his mind if things don't go well. That is an extremely risky situation to put a debutant kid defender into, and the exact reason no one does it.
That undoubtedly helps, but doesn't entirely counter it.
A 19 year old fullback with top defensive responsibility who has played nothing but youth football his entire life at nearly empty stadiums at most, to playing in front of 40,000 present fans, cameras everywhere, knowledge millions all over the world would be watching, and against one of the best sides in the world. That frame of reference is everything, as he has nothing to compare it to in his mind if things don't go well. That is an extremely risky situation to put a debutant kid defender into, and the exact reason no one does it.
arsenal did it with bellerin, his first appearance was away to dortmund.
arsenal did it with bellerin, his first appearance was away to dortmund.